ReXCam: Resource-Efficient, Cross-Camera Video Analytics at Scale
Open accessAbstract
Enterprises are increasingly deploying large camera networks for video analytics. Many target applications entail a common problem template: searching for and tracking an object or activity of interest (e.g. a speeding vehicle, a break-in) through a large camera network in live video. Such cross-camera analytics is compute and data intensive, with cost growing with the number of cameras and time. To address this cost challenge, we present ReXCam, a new system for efficient cross-camera video analytics. ReXCam exploits spatial and temporal locality in the dynamics of real camera networks to guide its inference-time search for a query identity. In an offline profiling phase, ReXCam builds a cross-camera correlation model that encodes the locality observed in historical traffic patterns. At inference time, ReXCam applies this model to filter frames that are not spatially and temporally correlated with the query identity's current position. In the cases of occasional missed detections, ReXCam performs a fast-replay search on recently filtered video frames, enabling gracefully recovery. Together, these techniques allow ReXCam to reduce compute workload by 8.3x on an 8-camera dataset, and by 23x - 38x on a simulated 130-camera dataset. ReXCam has been implemented and deployed on a testbed of 5 AWS DeepLens cameras.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ReXCam reduces computation workload by 4.6× and improves DNN model inference accuracy by 27%.
“ReXCam reduces computation workload by 4.6× and improves DNN model inference accuracy by 27%.”
From Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [99]
Cites
DeepMon: Mobile GPU-based Deep Learning Framework for Continuous Vision Applications
Huynh, L. N., Lee, Y., & Balan, R. K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services · doi:10.1145/3081333.3081360 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing
Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2918951 · Cited by 2,455 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jain, S., Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., Ananthanarayanan, G., Jiang, J., Shu, Y., & Gonzalez, J.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1811.01268
- OpenAlex
- W2991326320
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- video surveillance, object tracking, activity detection, multi-camera systems, spatial and temporal locality, frame filtering, resource-efficient inference, traffic patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review