ROBOTURK: A Crowdsourcing Platform for Robotic Skill Learning through Imitation
Open accessAbstract
Imitation Learning has empowered recent advances in learning robotic manipulation tasks by addressing shortcomings of Reinforcement Learning such as exploration and reward specification. However, research in this area has been limited to modest-sized datasets due to the difficulty of collecting large quantities of task demonstrations through existing mechanisms. This work introduces RoboTurk to address this challenge. RoboTurk is a crowdsourcing platform for high quality 6-DoF trajectory based teleoperation through the use of widely available mobile devices (e.g. iPhone). We evaluate RoboTurk on three manipulation tasks of varying timescales (15-120s) and observe that our user interface is statistically similar to special purpose hardware such as virtual reality controllers in terms of task completion times. Furthermore, we observe that poor network conditions, such as low bandwidth and high delay links, do not substantially affect the remote users' ability to perform task demonstrations successfully on RoboTurk. Lastly, we demonstrate the efficacy of RoboTurk through the collection of a pilot dataset; using RoboTurk, we collected 137.5 hours of manipulation data from remote workers, amounting to over 2200 successful task demonstrations in 22 hours of total system usage. We show that the data obtained through RoboTurk enables policy learning on multi-step manipulation tasks with sparse rewards and that using larger quantities of demonstrations during policy learning provides benefits in terms of both learning consistency and final performance. For additional results, videos, and to download our pilot dataset, visit $\href{http://roboturk.stanford.edu/}{\texttt{roboturk.stanford.edu}}$
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RoboTurk is a system for crowdsourcing task demonstrations from human operators using smartphone-based teleoperation and video streams provided in web browsers.
“RoboTurk [2,23-26] is a system for crowdsourcing task demonstrations from human operators using smartphone-based teleoperation and video streams provided in web browsers.”
From MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrations (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 134
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [13][13] A. Y. Ng, S. J. Russell, et al. Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. In Icml , pages 663-670, 2000. -
- [15][15] D. A. Pomerleau. Alvinn: An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 305-313, 1989. -
- [18][18] S. Krishnan, A. Garg, R. Liaw, B. Thananjeyan, L. Miller, F. T. Pokorny, and K. Goldberg. Swirl: A sequential windowed inverse reinforcement learning algorithm for robot tasks with delayed rewards. In Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR) , 2016. -
- [20][20] A. Boularias, J. Kober, and J. Peters. Relative entropy inverse reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 182-189, 2011. -
- [22][22] S. Osentoski, C. Crick, G. Jay, and O. C. Jenkins. Crowdsourcing for closed loop control. In Proc. of the NIPS Workshop on Computational Social Science and the Wisdom of Crowds, NIPS , 2010. -
- [23][23] K. Goldberg. Beyond the web: Excavating the real world via mosaic. In Second International WWW Conference , 1994. -
- [25][25] P. F. Hokayem and M. W. Spong. Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey. Automatica , 42(12): 2035-2057, 2006. -
- [31][31] B. Akgun, K. Subramanian, and A. L. Thomaz. Novel interaction strategies for learning from teleoperation. In AAAI Fall Symposium: Robots Learning Interactively from Human Teachers , 2012. -
- [39][39] L. Fan, Y. Zhu, J. Zhu, Z. Liu, O. Zeng, A. Gupta, J. Creus-Costa, S. Savarese, and L. Fei-Fei. Surreal: Open-source reinforcement learning framework and robot manipulation benchmark. In Conference on Robot Learning , 2018. -
- [42][42] K. Winstein, A. Sivaraman, and H. Balakrishnan. Stochastic forecasts achieve high throughput and low delay over cellular networks. In 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '13) , pages 459-471, 2013. -
- [45][45] S. Kakade and J. Langford. Approximately optimal approximate reinforcement learning. In ICML , 2002. -
- Authors
- Mandlekar, A., Zhu, Y., Garg, A., Booher, J., Spero, M., Tung, A., Gao, J., Emmons, J., Gupta, A., Orbay, E., Savarese, S., & Fei-Fei, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1811.02790
- OpenAlex
- W2898634286
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Keywords
- crowdsourcing platforms, imitation learning, robotic manipulation, teleoperation, mobile devices, sparse rewards, network conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review