Is it Safe to Drive? An Overview of Factors, Challenges, and Datasets for Driveability Assessment in Autonomous Driving
Open accessAbstract
With recent advances in learning algorithms and hardware development, autonomous cars have shown promise when operating in structured environments under good driving conditions. However, for complex, cluttered and unseen environments with high uncertainty, autonomous driving systems still frequently demonstrate erroneous or unexpected behaviors, that could lead to catastrophic outcomes. Autonomous vehicles should ideally adapt to driving conditions; while this can be achieved through multiple routes, it would be beneficial as a first step to be able to characterize Driveability in some quantified form. To this end, this paper aims to create a framework for investigating different factors that can impact driveability. Also, one of the main mechanisms to adapt autonomous driving systems to any driving condition is to be able to learn and generalize from representative scenarios. The machine learning algorithms that currently do so learn predominantly in a supervised manner and consequently need sufficient data for robust and efficient learning. Therefore, we also perform a comparative overview of 45 public driving datasets that enable learning and publish this dataset index at https://sites.google.com/view/driveability-survey-datasets. Specifically, we categorize the datasets according to use cases, and highlight the datasets that capture complicated and hazardous driving conditions which can be better used for training robust driving models. Furthermore, by discussions of what driving scenarios are not covered by existing public datasets and what driveability factors need more investigation and data acquisition, this paper aims to encourage both targeted dataset collection and the proposal of novel driveability metrics that enhance the robustness of autonomous cars in adverse environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More research is required on generalizing to 'complex, cluttered and unseen environments'.
“More research is required on generalizing to 'complex, cluttered and unseen environments' [36].”
From nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
While collecting data, the paper uses a Monte Carlo Localization scheme from lidar and odometry information.
“While collecting data, we use a Monte Carlo Localization scheme from lidar and odometry information [18].”
From nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles
Shah, S., Dey, D., Lovett, C., & Kapoor, A. (2018) · Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_40 · Cited by 2,254 · see citing works
1 year, 1000 km: The Oxford RobotCar dataset
Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., Linegar, C., & Newman, P. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364916679498 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Deep multimodal learning: a survey on recent advances and trends
Ramachandram, D., & Taylor, G. W. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2738401 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data collected from various types of sensors is greatly appreciated in deep multimodal learning, which is believed to enhance the inference performance of deep neural networks [117].”
BackgroundVirtualWorlds as Proxy for Multi-object Tracking Analysis
Gaidon, A., Wang, Q., Cabon, Y., & Vig, E. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.470 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion Point Clouds
Brostow, G. J., Shotton, J., Fauqueur, J., & Cipolla, R. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_5 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
The ApolloScape Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Huang, X., Cheng, X., Geng, Q., Cao, B., Zhou, D., Wang, P., Lin, Y., & Yang, R. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00141 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Car that Knows Before You Do: Anticipating Maneuvers via Learning Temporal Driving Models
Jain, A., Koppula, H. S., Raghavan, B., Soh, S., & Saxena, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.364 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
TorontoCity: Seeing the World with a Million Eyes
Wang, S., Bai, M., Mattyus, G., Chu, H., Luo, W., Yang, B., Liang, J., Cheverie, J., Fidler, S., & Urtasun, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.327 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152 · see citing works
“As suggested in [28], more research is required on how to generalize to “complex, cluttered and unseen environments”.”
Background
- Authors
- Guo, J., Kurup, U., & Shah, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1811.11277
- OpenAlex
- W2903414631
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, driving data, driving scenarios, dataset collection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review