The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Secure Federated Transfer Learning
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning relies on the availability of a vast amount of data for training. However, in reality, most data are scattered across different organizations and cannot be easily integrated under many legal and practical constraints. In this paper, we introduce a new technique and framework, known as federated transfer learning (FTL), to improve statistical models under a data federation. The federation allows knowledge to be shared without compromising user privacy, and enables complimentary knowledge to be transferred in the network. As a result, a target-domain party can build more flexible and powerful models by leveraging rich labels from a source-domain party. A secure transfer cross validation approach is also proposed to guard the FTL performance under the federation. The framework requires minimal modifications to the existing model structure and provides the same level of accuracy as the non-privacy-preserving approach. This framework is very flexible and can be effectively adapted to various secure multi-party machine learning tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [2][2] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, and B. A. y Arcas, 'Federated learning of deep networks using model averaging,' CoRR , vol. abs/1602.05629, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1602.05629 - · arXiv
- [4][4] S. J. Pan, X. Ni, J.-T. Sun, Q. Yang, and Z. Chen, 'Cross-domain sentiment classification via spectral feature alignment,' in WWW , 2010, pp. 751-760. -
- [5][5] K. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning,' in CCS , 2017, pp. 1175-1191. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Vincent Poor, H. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3075439 · Cited by 1,503
A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges
McEnroe, P., Wang, S., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3176400 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Kang, Y., Xing, C., Chen, T., & Yang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 70-82
- ISSN
- 1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1812.03337
- OpenAlex
- W2903890850
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- federated transfer learning, privacy-preserving machine learning, data federation, cross-domain knowledge transfer, data privacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
