Deep Learning on Graphs: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning has been shown to be successful in a number of domains, ranging from acoustics, images, to natural language processing. However, applying deep learning to the ubiquitous graph data is non-trivial because of the unique characteristics of graphs. Recently, substantial research efforts have been devoted to applying deep learning methods to graphs, resulting in beneficial advances in graph analysis techniques. In this survey, we comprehensively review the different types of deep learning methods on graphs. We divide the existing methods into five categories based on their model architectures and training strategies: graph recurrent neural networks, graph convolutional networks, graph autoencoders, graph reinforcement learning, and graph adversarial methods. We then provide a comprehensive overview of these methods in a systematic manner mainly by following their development history. We also analyze the differences and compositions of different methods. Finally, we briefly outline the applications in which they have been used and discuss potential future research directions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The abilities of state-of-the-art DL or DRL, such as Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning and Graph Neural Networks, can be exploited to facilitate optimizing edge computing networks.
“Besides, the abilities of the state-of-the-art DL or DRL, such as Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [288]- [290], Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) [291], [292], can also be exploited to facilitate this process.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [292]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(1) to a stable point using the Jacobi method [34], one gradient descent step is performed using the Almeida-Pineda algorithm [35], [36] to minimize a task-specific objective function, for example, the squared loss between the predicted values and the ground-truth for regression tasks; then, this process is repeated u…”
Chen, T., Wang, Z., Li, L., Li, D., Li, Z., Chang, X., Bian, P., Liang, G., Wang, Q., & Xie, T. (2025) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.ecoop.2025.6
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880 · see citing works
Self-citationConvergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Cui, P., & Zhu, W.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-270
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1812.04202
- OpenAlex
- W3011667710
- Cited by
- 1,692
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 141 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 283 · 2023: 273 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 97.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772304, U1611461, U1936219)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0102004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, recurrent graph neural networks, graph convolutional networks, graph autoencoder, graph reinforcement learning, graph analysis, graph data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
