CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 132Advanced Neural Network Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

IPOD: Intensive Point-based Object Detector for Point Cloud

Open access
Yang, Zetong, Sun, Yanan, Liu, Shu, Shen, Xiaoyong, Jia, Jiaya·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1812.05276arXiv 1812.05276
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present a novel 3D object detection framework, named IPOD, based on raw point cloud. It seeds object proposal for each point, which is the basic element. This paradigm provides us with high recall and high fidelity of information, leading to a suitable way to process point cloud data. We design an end-to-end trainable architecture, where features of all points within a proposal are extracted from the backbone network and achieve a proposal feature for final bounding inference. These features with both context information and precise point cloud coordinates yield improved performance. We conduct experiments on KITTI dataset, evaluating our performance in terms of 3D object detection, Bird's Eye View (BEV) detection and 2D object detection. Our method accomplishes new state-of-the-art , showing great advantage on the hard set.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1812.05276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LiDAR-based detection processes 3D point cloud data, offering precise depth estimation and spatial structure representation.

    “In contrast, LiDAR-based detection [73,74,75,76,77] processes 3D point cloud data, offering precise depth estimation and spatial structure representation.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [3][3] L. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A. L. Yuille. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 2018. -
  2. [4][4] X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li, and T. Xia. Multi-view 3d object detection network for autonomous driving. In CVPR , 2017. -
  3. [6][6] M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler, R. Benenson, U. Franke, S. Roth, and B. Schiele. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In CVPR , 2016. -
  4. [7][7] A. Dai, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, M. Halber, T. A. Funkhouser, and M. Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. In CVPR , 2017. -
  5. [8][8] A. Dai and M. Nießner. 3dmv: Joint 3d-multi-view prediction for 3d semantic scene segmentation. In ECCV , 2018. -
  6. [10][10] M. Engelcke, D. Rao, D. Z. Wang, C. H. Tong, and I. Posner. Vote3deep: Fast object detection in 3d point clouds using efficient convolutional neural networks. In ICRA , 2017. -
  7. [11][11] C. Fu, W. Liu, A. Ranga, A. Tyagi, and A. C. Berg. DSSD : Deconvolutional single shot detector. CoRR , 2017. -
  8. [13][13] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the KITTI vision benchmark suite. In CVPR , 2012. -
  9. [14][14] R. B. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR , 2014. -
  10. [16][16] M. Jaderberg, K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Spatial transformer networks. In NIPS , 2015. -
  11. [17][17] M. Jiang, Y. Wu, and C. Lu. Pointsift: A sift-like network module for 3d point cloud semantic segmentation. CoRR , 2018. -
  12. [18][18] D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR , 2014. -
  13. [19][19] J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh, and S. L. Waslander. Joint 3d proposal generation and object detection from view aggregation. CoRR , 2017. -
  14. [20][20] B. Li. 3d fully convolutional network for vehicle detection in point cloud. In IROS , 2017. -
  15. [21][21] J. Li, B. M. Chen, and G. H. Lee. So-net: Self-organizing network for point cloud analysis. CoRR , 2018. -
  16. [22][22] Y. Li, R. Bu, M. Sun, and B. Chen. Pointcnn. CoRR , 2018. -
  17. [24][24] T. Lin, P. Goyal, R. B. Girshick, K. He, and P. Doll´ ar. Focal loss for dense object detection. In ICCV , 2017. -
  18. [25][25] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. E. Reed, C. Fu, and A. C. Berg. SSD: single shot multibox detector. In ECCV , 2016. -
  19. [26][26] D. Maturana and S. Scherer. Voxnet: A 3d convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition. In IROS , 2015. -
  20. [30][30] C. R. Qi, H. Su, K. Mo, and L. J. Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In CVPR , 2017. -
  21. [31][31] C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In NIPS , 2017. -
  22. [33][33] B. Wu, A. Wan, X. Yue, and K. Keutzer. Squeezeseg: Convolutional neural nets with recurrent CRF for real-time roadobject segmentation from 3d lidar point cloud. In ICRA , 2018. -
  23. [34][34] H. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, and J. Jia. Pyramid scene parsing network. In CVPR , 2017. -
  24. [35][35] Y. Zhou and O. Tuzel. Voxelnet: End-to-end learning for point cloud based 3d object detection. CoRR , 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Sun, Y., Liu, S., Shen, X., & Jia, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1812.05276
arXiv
1812.05276
OpenAlex
W2904140919
Cited by
132
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
3D object detection, point clouds, object proposals, end-to-end architecture, contextual features, 2D object detection, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review