PreprintCited by 32IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesAge of Information Optimization

On the Performance and Optimization for MEC Networks Using Uplink NOMA

Open access
Ye, Yinghui, Lu, Guangyue, Hu, Rose Qingyang, Shi, Liqin·2019·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) based mobile edge computing (MEC) network, in which two users may partially offload their respective tasks to a single MEC server through uplink NOMA. We propose a new offloading scheme that can operate in three different modes, namely the partial computation offloading, the complete local computation, and the complete offloading. We further derive a closed-form expression of the successful computation probability for the proposed scheme. As part of the proposed offloading scheme, we formulate a problem to maximize the successful computation probability by jointly optimizing the time for offloading, the power allocation of the two users and the offloading ratios which decide how many tasks should be offloaded to the MEC server. We obtain the optimal solutions in the closed forms. Simulation results show that our proposed scheme can achieve the highest successful computation probability than the existing schemes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1901.04149

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2][2] F. Zhou, Y. Wu, R. Q. Hu, and Y. Qian, 'Computation rate maximization in UAV-enabled wireless-powered mobile-edge computing systems,' IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1927-1941, Sept 2018. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, Y., Lu, G., Hu, R. Q., & Shi, L.
Affiliations
  • Xidian University (CN)
  • Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Utah State University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2164-7038 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910435317
Cited by
32
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
Keywords
mobile edge computing, non-orthogonal multiple access, uplink NOMA, computation offloading, power allocation, offloading ratio, joint optimization, task offloading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review