Vehicular Edge Computing via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
The smart vehicles construct Vehicle of Internet which can execute various intelligent services. Although the computation capability of the vehicle is limited, multi-type of edge computing nodes provide heterogeneous resources for vehicular services.When offloading the complicated service to the vehicular edge computing node, the decision should consider numerous factors.The offloading decision work mostly formulate the decision to a resource scheduling problem with single or multiple objective function and some constraints, and explore customized heuristics algorithms. However, offloading multiple data dependency tasks in a service is a difficult decision, as an optimal solution must understand the resource requirement, the access network, the user mobility, and importantly the data dependency. Inspired by recent advances in machine learning, we propose a knowledge driven (KD) service offloading decision framework for Vehicle of Internet, which provides the optimal policy directly from the environment. We formulate the offloading decision of multi-task in a service as a long-term planning problem, and explores the recent deep reinforcement learning to obtain the optimal solution. It considers the future data dependency of the following tasks when making decision for a current task from the learned offloading knowledge. Moreover, the framework supports the pre-training at the powerful edge computing node and continually online learning when the vehicular service is executed, so that it can adapt the environment changes and learns policy that are sensible in hindsight. The simulation results show that KD service offloading decision converges quickly, adapts to different conditions, and outperforms the greedy offloading decision algorithm.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DRL is used in [111] to obtain the optimal task offloading policy in vehicular edge computing.
“Similarly, DRL is also used in [111] to obtain the optimal task offloading policy in vehicular edge computing.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [111]
Cites
Resource Management with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mao, H., Alizadeh, M., Menache, I., & Kandula, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks · doi:10.1145/3005745.3005750 · Cited by 1,353 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Mao et al. [21] finding the optimal resource management policy by DRL.”
BackgroundLuong, N. C., Xiong, Z., Wang, P., & Niyato, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8422743 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qi, Q., & Ma, Z.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1901.04290
- OpenAlex
- W2910007539
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Keywords
- vehicular edge computing, computation offloading, deep reinforcement learning, long-term planning, online learning, pre-training, resource scheduling, user mobility, heterogeneous edge nodes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review