CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 108Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsInnovation, Technology, and Society

Artificial Intelligence for Social Good

Open access
Hager, Gregory D., Drobnis, Ann, Fang, Fei, Ghani, Rayid, Greenwald, Amy, Lyons, Terah, Parkes, David C., Schultz, Jason +3 more·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1901.05406arXiv 1901.05406
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The Computing Community Consortium (CCC), along with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), co-sponsored a public workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Social Good on June 7th, 2016 in Washington, DC. This was one of five workshops that OSTP co-sponsored and held around the country to spur public dialogue on artificial intelligence, machine learning, and to identify challenges and opportunities related to AI. In the AI for Social Good workshop, the successful deployments and the potential use of AI in various topics that are essential for social good were discussed, including but not limited to urban computing, health, environmental sustainability, and public welfare. This report highlights each of these as well as a number of crosscutting issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1901.05406

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data provenance can be used to mitigate data poisoning, thus enhancing the robustness and security of an AI system.

    “Moreover, recent research has shown that data provenance can be used to mitigate data poisoning [32], thus enhancing the robustness and security of an AI system.”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Fundamental Issues section calls for transparency and traceability of data collection and decision-making, but does not link either to mitigating data poisoning. Searches for data provenance, data poisoning, and poisoning attacks found no passage in our copy addressing that proposed defense. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Bareinboim, E., Lee, S., Honavar, V. and Pearl, J. (2013). Transportability from Multiple Environments with Limited Experiments. In: Advances in Neural Information Systems (NIPS) 2013. pp. 136-144.
  2. Bui, N., Yen, J., and Honavar, V. (2016). Temporal Causality Analysis of Sentiment Change in a Cancer Survivor Network. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. In press.
  3. Samuel Carton, Jennifer Helsby, Kenneth Joseph, Ayesha Mahmud, Youngsoo Park, Joe Walsh, Crystal Cody, CPT Estella Patterson, Lauren Haynes, and Rayid Ghani. 2016. Identifying Police Officers at Risk of Adverse Events. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16)
  4. Chow, Y., Tamar, A., Mannor, S., & Pavone, M. (2015). Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approach. In NIPS 2015.
  5. Dente CJ, Shaz BH, Nicholas JM, Harris RS, Wyrzykowski AD, Patel S, Shah A, Vercruysse GA, Feliciano DV, Rozycki GS, Salomone JP, Ingram W: Improvements in Early Mortality and Coagulopathy Are Sustained Better in Patients with Blunt Trauma After Institution of a Massive Transfusion Protocol in a Civilian Level I Trauma Center. Journal of Trauma 66(6): 1616-24, 2009.
  6. Fang, F., Nguyen, T. H., Pickles, R., Lam, W. Y., Clements, G. R., An, B., Singh, A.,Tambe, M., Lemieux, A. (2016). Deploying PAWS : Field Optimization of the Protection Assistant for Wildlife Security. In Proceedings of the Twenty- Eighth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. AAAI.
  7. Forsberg JA, Potter BK, Wagner MB, Vickers A, Dente CJ, Kirk AD, Elster EA. Lessons of War: Turning Data Into Decisions. EBioMedicine. 2015 Jul 17;2(9):1235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.022. eCollection 2015 Sep. · DOI
  8. Henry, K.E., Hager, D.N., Pronovost, P.J. and Saria, S., 2015. A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock. Science Translational Medicine, 7(299), pp.299ra122-299ra122.
  9. Hripcsak, G. and Albers, D.J., 2013. Correlating electronic health record concepts with healthcare process events. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e2), pp.e311-e318.
  10. K. Marazopoulou, M. Maier, and D. Jensen (2015). Learning the structure of causal models with relational and temporal dependence. In Proceedings of the Thirty-first Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
  11. Himabindu Lakkaraju, Everaldo Aguiar, Carl Shan, David Miller, Nasir Bhanpuri, Rayid Ghani, Kecia Addison. A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes. Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2015).
  12. Lee, S. and Honavar, V. (2013). Causal Transportability of Experiments on Controllable Subsets of Variables: z-Transportability. In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2013).
  13. Lee, S. and Honavar, V. (2013). Transportability of a Causal Effect from Multiple Environments. In: Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2013).
  14. Lee, S. and Honavar, V. (2016). A Characterization of Markov Equivalence Classes of Relational Causal Models under Path Semantics In: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2016).
  15. Lee, S. and Honavar, V. (2016). On learning causal models from relational data. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16).
  16. Lewandowski LR, Weintrob AC, Tribble DR, et al. Early complications and outcomes in combat injury related invasive fungal wound infections: a case-control analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:e93-e99.
  17. Maciel JD, Gifford E, Plurad D, de Virgilio C, Bricker S, Bongard F, Neville A, Smith J, Putnam B, Kim D: The Impact of a Massive Transfusion Protocol on Outcomes Among Patients with Abdominal Aortic Injuries. Annals of Vascular Surgery 29(4): 764-769, 2015.
  18. Maciel JD, Gifford E, Plurad D, de Virgilio C, Bricker S, Bongard F, Neville A, Smith J, Putnam B, Kim D: The Impact of a Massive Transfusion Protocol on Outcomes Among Patients with Abdominal Aortic Injuries. Annals of Vascular Surgery 29(4): 764-769, 2015.
  19. Maier M, B. Taylor, H. Oktay and D. Jensen (2010). Learning causal models of relational domains. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  20. Maier M, K. Marazopoulou, D. Arbour, and D. Jensen (2013). A sound and complete algorithm for learning causal models from relational data. In Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Bellevue, WA.
  21. McDaniel LM, Etchill EW, Raval JS, Neal MD: State of the Art: Massive Transfusion. Transfusion Medicine 24(3): 138-144, 2014.
  22. Murphy, Susan A. "Optimal dynamic treatment regimes." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 65, no. 2 (2003): 331-355.
  23. Thanh H. Nguyen, Arunesh Sinha, Shahrzad Gholami, Andrew J. Plumptre, Lucas Joppa, Milind Tambe, Margaret Driciru, Fred Wanyama, Aggrey Rwetsiba, Rob Critchlow, Colin Beale.CAPTURE: A New Predictive Anti-Poaching Tool for Wildlife Protection. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS). 2016
  24. Nicol, S., Fuller, R. A., Iwamura, T., & Chadès, I. (2015). Adapting environmental management to uncertain but inevitable change. Proceedings Royal Society B, 282(1808), 20142984. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2984 · DOI
  25. O'Keeffe T, Refaai M, Tchorz K, Forestner JE, Sarode R: A Massive Transfusion Protocol to Decrease Blood Component Use and Costs. Archives of Surgery 143(7): 686-691, 2008.
  26. Paxton, C., Niculescu-Mizil, A. and Saria, S., (2013). Developing predictive models using electronic medical records: challenges and pitfalls. In AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings (pp. 1109-1115).
  27. Pearl J (2015) Generalizing experimental findings. Journal of Causal Inference 3(2): 259-266.
  28. Pineau, J., Gordon, G., & Thrun, S. (2003). Point-based value iteration: An anytime algorithm for POMDPs. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1025-1030).
  29. Eric Potash, Joe Brew, Alexander Loewi, Subhabrata Majumdar, Andrew Reece, Joe Walsh, Eric Rozier, Emile Jorgenson, Raed Mansour, Rayid Ghani. Predictive Modeling for Public Health: Preventing Childhood Lead Poisoning. Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2015).
  30. Robins, James M. "Optimal structural nested models for optimal sequential decisions." In Proceedings of the second seattle Symposium in Biostatistics, pp. 189-326.
  31. Rodriguez C, Weintrob AC, Shah J, et al. Risk factors associated with invasive fungal infections in combat trauma. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15:521-526.
  32. Saria, S., & Goldenberg, A. (2015). Subtyping: What it is and its role in precision medicine. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 30(4), 70-75.
  33. Saria, S., Rajani, A.K., Gould, J., Koller, D. and Penn, A.A., 2010. Integration of early physiological responses predicts later illness severity in preterm infants. Science translational medicine, 2(48), pp.48ra65-48ra65.
  34. Saria S., A. K. Rajani, J. Gould, D. Koller, and A. A. Penn, "Integration of early physiological responses predicts later illness severity in preterm infants," Science translational medicine, vol. 2, no. 48, pp. 48ra65-48ra65, 2010.
  35. Schulam, P., & Saria, S. (2015). A Framework for Individualizing Predictions of Disease Trajectories by Exploiting Multi-Resolution Structure. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 748-756).
  36. Schulam, P., & Saria, S. (2016). Integrative Analysis using Coupled Latent Variable Models for Individualizing Prognoses. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (in press).
  37. Sheldon, D., Dilkina, B., Elmachtoub, A., Finseth, R., Sabharwal, A., Conrad, J., Finseth, R., Sabharwal, A., Conrad, J., Gomes, C., Shmoys, D., Allen, W., Amundsen, O. (2010). Maximizing the spread of cascades using network design. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 517-526).
  38. Smith, S.F., Smart Infrastructure for Urban Mobility. Slides from the AI for Social Good Workshop. http://cra.org/ccc/ wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/06/Stephen-Smith-AI- slides.pdf
  39. Smith, S.F. G.J. Barlow, X-F Xie, and Z.B. Rubinstein, " Smart Urban Signal Networks: Initial Application of the SURTRAC Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System", Proceedings 23rd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Rome, Italy, June 2013. Studies Question the Pairing of Food Deserts and Obesity. The New York Times. (2012). http://www.nytimes. com/2012/04/18/health/research/pairing-of-food-deserts- and-obesity-challenged-in-studies.html?_r=1 M. Tambe Security and Game Theory: Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  40. Tribble DR, Rodriguez CJ. Combat-related invasive fungal wound infections. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2014; 8:277-286.
  41. van de Giesen, N., Hut, R. and Selker, J. (2014), The Trans- African Hydro-Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO). WIREs Water, 1: 341-348. doi:10.1002/wat2.1034 · DOI
  42. Van Hentenryck, P. Reinventing Mobility with Artificial Intelligence. Slides from the AI for Social Good Workshop. http://cra.org/ccc/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2016/06/
  43. Warkentien T, Rodriguez C, Lloyd B, et al. Invasive mold infections following combat-related injuries. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55:1441-1449.
  44. Wiens, J., Horvitz, E. and Guttag, J.V., 2012. Patient risk stratification for hospital-associated c. diff as a time-series classification task. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 467-475).
  45. Xie, X-F, S.F. Smith and G.J. Barlow, "Schedule-Driven Coordination for Real-Time Traffic Network Control", Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Atibaia, Sao Paulo, Brazil, June 2012.
  46. Xue, S., Fern, A., & Sheldon, D. (2015). Scheduling conservation designs for maximum flexibility via network cascade optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 52, 331-360.
  47. Yang, R., Benjamin Ford, Milind Tambe, Andrew Lemieux. Adaptive Resource Allocation for Wildlife Protection against Illegal Poachers. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), May, 2014.
  48. Post-workshop AI Roundtable Discussion Roy Austin, White House Guru Banavar, IBM Tanya Berger-Wolf, University of Illinois at Chicago, IBEIS.org
  49. Evan Cooke, OSTP Thomas Dietterich, Oregon State University/AAAI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hager, G. D., Drobnis, A., Fang, F., Ghani, R., Greenwald, A., Lyons, T., Parkes, D. C., Schultz, J., Saria, S., Smith, S. F., & Tambe, M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1901.05406
arXiv
1901.05406
OpenAlex
W2909350736
Cited by
108
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
machine learning applications, urban computing, environmental sustainability, public welfare, AI deployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review