The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Robust Implementation of Generative Modeling with Parametrized Quantum Circuits
Open accessAbstract
Although the performance of hybrid quantum-classical algorithms is highly dependent on the selection of the classical optimizer and the circuit ansatz, a robust and thorough assessment on-hardware of such features has been missing to date. From the optimizer perspective, the primary challenge lies in the solver's stochastic nature, and their significant variance over the random initialization. Therefore, a robust comparison requires that one perform several training curves for each solver before one can reach conclusions about their typical performance. Since each of the training curves requires the execution of thousands of quantum circuits in the quantum computer, such a robust study remained a steep challenge for most hybrid platforms available today. Here, we leverage on Rigetti's Quantum Cloud Services to overcome this implementation barrier, and we study the on-hardware performance of the data-driven quantum circuit learning (DDQCL) for three different state-of-the-art classical solvers, and on two-different circuit ansatze associated to different entangling connectivity graphs for the same task. Additionally, we assess the gains in performance from varying circuit depths. To evaluate the typical performance associated with each of these settings in this benchmark study, we use at least five independent runs of DDQCL towards the generation of quantum generative models capable of capturing the patterns of the canonical Bars and Stripes data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“QCBMs are well suited to be run on current NISQ hardware and can serve as benchmarks (Hamilton et al. ,”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Leyton-Ortega et al. , 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Generative models such as the QCBM (see Sec. VI.B.2) can also serve as benchmarks for NISQ devices (Hamilton et al. , 2019; Leyton-Ortega et al. , 2019; Zhu et al. , 2019).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Leyton-Ortega et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]Marcello Benedetti, Delfina Garcia-Pintos, Oscar Perdomo, Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Yunseong Nam, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, 'A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits,' arXiv:1801.07686 (2018). · arXiv
- [2]Kathleen E. Hamilton, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and Raphael C. Pooser, 'Generative model benchmarks for superconducting qubits,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09905 (2018). · arXiv
- [3]D. Zhu, N. M. Linke, M. Benedetti, K. A. Landsman, N. H. Nguyen, C. H. Alderete, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, N. Korda, A. Garfoot, C. Brecque, L. Egan, O. Perdomo, and C. Monroe, 'Training of quantum circuits on a hybrid quantum computer,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08862 (2018). · arXiv
- [6]Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, 'The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,' New Journal of Physics 18 , 023023 (2016).
- [7]Sam Gutmann Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, 'A quantum approximate optimization algorithm,' arXiv:1411.4028 (2014). · arXiv
- [8]Yu-Ren Liu, Yi-Qi Hu, Hong Qian, Yang Yu, and Chao Qian, 'Toolbox for derivative-free optimization,' arXiv:1801.00329 (2017). · arXiv
- [9]Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba, 'Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,' arXiv:1412.6980 (2014). · arXiv
- [10]Jasper Snoek, Hugo Larochelle, and Ryan P. Adams, 'Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.2944 (2012). · arXiv
- [11]Jin-Guo Liu and Lei Wang, 'Differentiable learning of quantum circuit born machine,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.04168 (2018). · arXiv
- [12]Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao, 'The expressive power of parameterized quantum circuits,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11922 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Metadata
- Authors
- Leyton-Ortega, V., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., & Perdomo, O.
- Affiliations
- Central Connecticut State University (US)
- ORCID
- Perdomo, Oscar
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2524-4906 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1901.08047
- OpenAlex
- W2912892157
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Quantum Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Advanced Scientific Computing Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum generative models, variational quantum circuits, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, derivative-free optimization, circuit depth, noisy quantum hardware, benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust Implementation of Generative Modeling with Parametrized Quantum Circuits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1901.08047
- The paper
- Leyton-Ortega, V., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., & Perdomo, O. (2019). Robust Implementation of Generative Modeling with Parametrized Quantum Circuits. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1901.08047
