The DOI matches its DataCite record.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
Abstract
Biomedical text mining is becoming increasingly important as the number of biomedical documents rapidly grows. With the progress in natural language processing (NLP), extracting valuable information from biomedical literature has gained popularity among researchers, and deep learning has boosted the development of effective biomedical text mining models. However, directly applying the advancements in NLP to biomedical text mining often yields unsatisfactory results due to a word distribution shift from general domain corpora to biomedical corpora. In this article, we investigate how the recently introduced pre-trained language model BERT can be adapted for biomedical corpora. We introduce BioBERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers for Biomedical Text Mining), which is a domain-specific language representation model pre-trained on large-scale biomedical corpora. With almost the same architecture across tasks, BioBERT largely outperforms BERT and previous state-of-the-art models in a variety of biomedical text mining tasks when pre-trained on biomedical corpora. While BERT obtains performance comparable to that of previous state-of-the-art models, BioBERT significantly outperforms them on the following three representative biomedical text mining tasks: biomedical named entity recognition (0.62% F1 score improvement), biomedical relation extraction (2.80% F1 score improvement) and biomedical question answering (12.24% MRR improvement). Our analysis results show that pre-training BERT on biomedical corpora helps it to understand complex biomedical texts. We make the pre-trained weights of BioBERT freely available at https://github.com/naver/biobert-pretrained, and the source code for fine-tuning BioBERT available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/biobert.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, SCIB-ERT achieves new SOTA results on BC5CDR and ChemProt (Lee et al., 2019), and EBM-NLP (Nye et al., 2018).”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“SCIBERT significantly outperformed BERT-Base and achieves new SOTA results on several of these tasks, even compared to some reported BIOBERT (Lee et al., 2019) results on biomedical tasks.”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“The SOTA model for NCBI-disease is BIOBERT (Lee et al., 2019), which is BERT-Base finetuned on 18B tokens from biomedical papers.”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, SCIBERT uses an in-domain vocabulary (SCIVOCAB) while the other abovementioned models use the original BERT vocabulary (BASEVOCAB).”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“In Table 2, we compare SCIBERT results with reported BIOBERT results on the subset of datasets included in (Lee et al., 2019) BC5CDR and ChemProt, and performs similarly on JNLPBA despite being trained on a substantially smaller biomedical corpus.”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“BIOBERT is trained on PubMed abstracts and PMC full text articles, and CLIN-ICALBERT is trained on clinical text from the MIMIC-III database (Johnson et al., 2016).”
From SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Alsentzer,E. et al. (2019) Publicly available clinical bert embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 72-78. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.acl web.org/anthology/W19-1909.
- Devlin,J. et al. (2019) Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 4171-4186. Association for Computational Linguistics. https:// www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-1423.
- Kim,J.-D. et al. (2004) Introduction to the bio-entity recognition task at JNLPBA. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications (NLPBA/BioNLP), Geneva, Switzerland. pp. 73-78. COLING. https:// www.aclweb.org/anthology/W04-1213.
- Krallinger,M. et al. (2017) Overview of the BioCreative VI chemical-protein interaction track. In: Proceedings of the BioCreative VI Workshop, Bethesda, MD, USA, pp. 141-146. https://academic.oup.com/database/art icle/doi/10.1093/database/bay073/5055578. · DOI
- Lin,C. et al. (2019) A bert-based universal model for both within-and cross-sentence clinical temporal relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 65-71. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www. aclweb.org/anthology/W19-1908.
- McCann,B. et al. (2017) Learned in translation: contextualized word vectors. In: Guyon,I. et al. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 6294-6305. http://papers.nips.cc/ paper/7209-learned-in-translation-contextualized-word-vectors.pdf.
- Mikolov,T. et al. (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Burges,C.J.C. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 3111-3119. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5021-distributed-representations- of-words-and-phrases-and-their-compositionality.pdf.
- Mohan,S. and Li,D. (2019) Medmentions: a large biomedical corpus anno- tated with UMLS concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1902.09476. · arXiv
- Pennington,J. et al. (2014) Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar. pp. 1532-1543. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1162.
- Peters,M.E. et al. (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), New Orleans, LA. pp. 2227-2237. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthol ogy/N18-1202.
- Pyysalo,S. et al. (2013) Distributional semantics resources for biomedical text processing. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Languages in Biology and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 39-43. https://aca demic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/33/14/i37/3953940.
- Rajpurkar,P. et al. (2016) Squad: 100,000þ questions for machine compre- hension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, TX. pp. 2383-2392. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthol ogy/D16-1264.
- Sachan,D.S. et al. (2018) Effective use of bidirectional language modeling for transfer learning in biomedical named entity recognition. In: Finale,D.-V. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Palo Alto, CA, Vol. 85, pp. 383-402. PMLR. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v85/sachan18a.html.
- Sousa,D. et al. (2019) A silver standard corpus of human phenotype-gene rela- tions. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN. pp. 1487-1492. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb. org/anthology/N19-1152.
- Sung,N. et al. (2017) NSML: A machine learning platform that enables you to focus on your models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1712.05902. · arXiv
- Vaswani,A. et al. (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Guyon,I. et al. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998-6008.
- Wiese,G. et al. (2017) Neural domain adaptation for biomedical question answering. In: Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017), Vancouver, Canada. pp. 281-289. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb. org/anthology/K17-1029.
- Wu,Y. et al. (2016) Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1609.08144. · arXiv
- Zhu,H. et al. (2018) Clinical concept extraction with contextual word embed- ding. NIPS Machine Learning for Health Workshop. http://par.nsf.gov/bib lio/10098080.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1371 · Cited by 3,218
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Yoon, W., Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, S., So, C. H., & Kang, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1901.08746
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review


