ML for Flood Forecasting at Scale
Open accessAbstract
Effective riverine flood forecasting at scale is hindered by a multitude of factors, most notably the need to rely on human calibration in current methodology, the limited amount of data for a specific location, and the computational difficulty of building continent/global level models that are sufficiently accurate. Machine learning (ML) is primed to be useful in this scenario: learned models often surpass human experts in complex high-dimensional scenarios, and the framework of transfer or multitask learning is an appealing solution for leveraging local signals to achieve improved global performance. We propose to build on these strengths and develop ML systems for timely and accurate riverine flood prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DL has the ability to enhance human lives by providing additional accuracy in diagnosis, including estimating natural disasters, the discovery of new drugs, and cancer diagnosis.
“In fact, DL has the ability to enhance human lives by providing additional accuracy in diagnosis, including estimating natural disasters [40], the discovery of new drugs [41], and cancer diagnosis [42–44].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
The Abstract (pp. 1–2) proposes machine-learning systems for more accurate riverine flood prediction, supporting the natural-disaster forecasting part attached to citation [40]. It does not specifically establish improved accuracy from deep learning; its reported flood-extent accuracy is for a hydro-dynamic model, not a deep-learning model. The drug-discovery and cancer-diagnosis examples carry other citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [6][6] Yohai Bar-Sinai, Stephan Hoyer, Jason Hickey, and Michael P Brenner. Data-driven discretization: a method for systematic coarse graining of partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.04930 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [7][7] Keith Beven. Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically-based models. Journal of hydrology , 105(1-2):157-172, 1989. -
- [8][8] Keith J Beven. Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer . John Wiley & Sons, 2011. -
- [9][9] George EP Box, Gwilym M Jenkins, Gregory C Reinsel, and Greta M Ljung. Time series analysis: forecasting and control . John Wiley & Sons, 2015. -
- [10][10] Douglas P Boyle, Hoshin V Gupta, and Soroosh Sorooshian. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resources Research , 36(12):3663-3674, 2000. -
- [11][11] Marina Campolo, Paolo Andreussi, and Alfredo Soldati. River flood forecasting with a neural network model. Water resources research , 35(4):1191-1197, 1999. -
- [13][13] CWDawson and RL Wilby. Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in physical Geography , 25(1):80-108, 2001. -
- [14][14] Shannon Doocy, Amy Daniels, Catherine Packer, Anna Dick, and Thomas D Kirsch. The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS currents , 5, 2013. -
- [15][15] K Eckhardt and JG Arnold. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. Journal of hydrology , 251(1-2):103-109, 2001. -
- [16][16] Yotam Gigi, Gal Elidan, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Zach Moshe, Sella Nevo, Guy Shalev, and Ami Wiesel. Towards global remote discharge estimation: Using the few to estimate the many. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS AI for Social Good Workshop , 2018. -
- [17][17] Hoshin Vijai Gupta, Soroosh Sorooshian, and Patrice Ogou Yapo. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering , 4(2):135-143, 1999. -
- [18][18] Kuo-lin Hsu, Hoshin V Gupta, Xiaogang Gao, Soroosh Sorooshian, and Bisher Imam. Selforganizing linear output map (solo): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis. Water Resources Research , 38(12):38-1, 2002. -
- [19][19] Kuo-lin Hsu, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Soroosh Sorooshian. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water resources research , 31(10):2517-2530, 1995. -
- [20][20] Ashu Jain and Avadhnam Madhav Kumar. Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing , 7(2):585-592, 2007. -
- [21][21] Sebastiaan N Jonkman. Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Natural hazards , 34(2):151-175, 2005. -
- [23][23] Thomas Loster. Flood trends and global change. In Proceedings IIASA Conf on Global Change and Catastrophe Management: Flood Risks in Europe , 1999. -
- [24][24] Henrik Madsen, Geoffrey Wilson, and Hans Christian Ammentorp. Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology , 261(14):48-59, 2002. -
- [26][26] Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , 22(10), 2010. -
- [28][28] Durga L Shrestha and Dimitri P Solomatine. Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output. Neural Networks , 19(2):225-235, 2006. -
- [29][29] David Strömberg. Natural disasters, economic development, and humanitarian aid. Journal of Economic perspectives , 21(3):199-222, 2007. -
- [30][30] A Sezin Tokar and Peggy A Johnson. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering , 4(3):232-239, 1999. -
- [31][31] Weiming Wu. Computational river dynamics . CRC Press, 2007.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M., & Farhan, L. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 · Cited by 7,906 · see citing works
Review of Deep Learning Algorithms and Architectures
Shrestha, A., & Mahmood, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2912200 · Cited by 1,883 · see citing works
“Deep learning has a potential to improve human lives with more accurate diagnosis of diseases like cancer [10], discovery of new drugs, prediction of natural disasters [11].”
BackgroundTackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nevo, S., Anisimov, V., Elidan, G., El-Yaniv, R., Giencke, P., Gigi, Y., Hassidim, A., Moshe, Z., Schlesinger, M., Shalev, G., Tirumali, A., Wiesel, A., Zlydenko, O., & Matias, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1901.09583
- OpenAlex
- W2912906518
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- machine learning, transfer learning, multi-task learning, data-scarce regions, model calibration, high-dimensional data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
