Curiosity-Driven Experience Prioritization via Density Estimation
Open accessAbstract
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), an agent explores the environment and collects trajectories into the memory buffer for later learning. However, the collected trajectories can easily be imbalanced with respect to the achieved goal states. The problem of learning from imbalanced data is a well-known problem in supervised learning, but has not yet been thoroughly researched in RL. To address this problem, we propose a novel Curiosity-Driven Prioritization (CDP) framework to encourage the agent to over-sample those trajectories that have rare achieved goal states. The CDP framework mimics the human learning process and focuses more on relatively uncommon events. We evaluate our methods using the robotic environment provided by OpenAI Gym. The environment contains six robot manipulation tasks. In our experiments, we combined CDP with Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) with or without Hindsight Experience Replay (HER). The experimental results show that CDP improves both performance and sample-efficiency of reinforcement learning agents, compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Density models have been flexibly used to model state-action visitations for both large discrete state-action spaces via pseudo-counts and continuous state-action spaces.
“Notably, density models have been flexibly used to model state-action visitations for both large discrete state-action spaces (via pseudo-counts [8, 36]) and continuous state-action spaces [62, 61].”
From Improving Environment Novelty Quantification for Effective Unsupervised Environment Design (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To overcome the class imbalance issue in supervised learning, such as training deep convolutional neural networks with biased datasets, researchers utilized over-sampling and under-sampling techniques [14, 7, 16].”
What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches
Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2007) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Planning to be surprised: optimal bayesian exploration in dynamic environments
Sun, Y., Gomez, F., & Schmidhuber, J. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_5 · Cited by 134 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Curiosity-driven exploration is a well-studied topic in reinforcement learning [33, 34, 43, 44, 48].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploration in deep reinforcement learning: A survey
Ladosz, P., Weng, L., Kim, M., & Oh, H. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.03.003 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
“The density models include context tree switching (CTS) [14], Gaussian mixture models [66] or PixelCNN [67].”
MethodImproving Environment Novelty Quantification for Effective Unsupervised Environment Design
Teoh, J., Li, W., & Varakantham, P. (2025) · arXiv
“Notably, density models have been flexibly used to model state-action visitations for both large discrete state-action spaces (via pseudo-counts [8, 36]) and continuous state-action spaces [62, 61].”
Improving Environment Novelty Quantification for Effective Unsupervised Environment Design
Teoh, J., Li, W., & Varakantham, P. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-4300
- Authors
- Zhao, R., & Tresp, V.
- Affiliations
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1902.08039
- OpenAlex
- W2905606790
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Keywords
- density estimation, class imbalance, sample efficiency, robotic manipulation, deep deterministic policy gradient, hindsight experience replay, buffer memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review