PreprintCited by 47Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control

Curiosity-Driven Experience Prioritization via Density Estimation

Open access
Zhao, Rui, Tresp, Volker·2019·arXiv

Abstract

In Reinforcement Learning (RL), an agent explores the environment and collects trajectories into the memory buffer for later learning. However, the collected trajectories can easily be imbalanced with respect to the achieved goal states. The problem of learning from imbalanced data is a well-known problem in supervised learning, but has not yet been thoroughly researched in RL. To address this problem, we propose a novel Curiosity-Driven Prioritization (CDP) framework to encourage the agent to over-sample those trajectories that have rare achieved goal states. The CDP framework mimics the human learning process and focuses more on relatively uncommon events. We evaluate our methods using the robotic environment provided by OpenAI Gym. The environment contains six robot manipulation tasks. In our experiments, we combined CDP with Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) with or without Hindsight Experience Replay (HER). The experimental results show that CDP improves both performance and sample-efficiency of reinforcement learning agents, compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1902.08039

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Density models have been flexibly used to model state-action visitations for both large discrete state-action spaces via pseudo-counts and continuous state-action spaces.

    “Notably, density models have been flexibly used to model state-action visitations for both large discrete state-action spaces (via pseudo-counts [8, 36]) and continuous state-action spaces [62, 61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, R., & Tresp, V.
Affiliations
Siemens (Germany) (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905606790
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Keywords
density estimation, class imbalance, sample efficiency, robotic manipulation, deep deterministic policy gradient, hindsight experience replay, buffer memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review