PreprintCited by 7Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifeStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

The remote detectability of Earth's biosphere through time and the importance of UV capability for characterizing habitable exoplanets

Open access
Reinhard, Christopher T., Schwieterman, Edward W., Olson, Stephanie L., Planavsky, Noah J., Arney, Giada N., Ozaki, Kazumi, Som, Sanjoy, Robinson, Tyler D. +5 more·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Thousands of planets beyond our solar system have been discovered to date, dozens of which are rocky in composition and are orbiting within the circumstellar habitable zone of their host star. The next frontier in life detection beyond our solar system will be detailed characterization of the atmospheres of potentially habitable worlds, resulting in a pressing need to develop a comprehensive understanding of the factors controlling the emergence and maintenance of atmospheric biosignatures. Understanding Earth system evolution is central to this pursuit, and a refined understanding of Earth's evolution can provide substantive insight into observational and interpretive frameworks in exoplanet science. Using this framework, we argue here that UV observations can help to effectively mitigate 'false positive' scenarios for oxygen-based biosignatures, while 'false negative' scenarios potentially represent a significant problem for biosignature surveys lacking UV capability. Moving forward, we suggest that well-resolved UV observations will be critical for near-term volume-limited surveys of habitable planets orbiting nearby Sun-like stars, and will provide the potential for biosignature detection across the most diverse spectrum of reducing, weakly oxygenated, and oxic habitable terrestrial planets.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1903.05611

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinhard, C. T., Schwieterman, E. W., Olson, S. L., Planavsky, N. J., Arney, G. N., Ozaki, K., Som, S., Robinson, T. D., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Lisman, D., Mennesson, B., Meadows, V. S., & Lyons, T. W.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
526
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015454269
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
biosignatures, Earth system evolution, habitable exoplanets, ultraviolet spectroscopy, solar-type stars, habitable zone, exoplanet characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review