The DOI matches its DataCite record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DetNAS: Backbone Search for Object Detection
Open accessAbstract
Object detectors are usually equipped with backbone networks designed for image classification. It might be sub-optimal because of the gap between the tasks of image classification and object detection. In this work, we present DetNAS to use Neural Architecture Search (NAS) for the design of better backbones for object detection. It is non-trivial because detection training typically needs ImageNet pre-training while NAS systems require accuracies on the target detection task as supervisory signals. Based on the technique of one-shot supernet, which contains all possible networks in the search space, we propose a framework for backbone search on object detection. We train the supernet under the typical detector training schedule: ImageNet pre-training and detection fine-tuning. Then, the architecture search is performed on the trained supernet, using the detection task as the guidance. This framework makes NAS on backbones very efficient. In experiments, we show the effectiveness of DetNAS on various detectors, for instance, one-stage RetinaNet and the two-stage FPN. We empirically find that networks searched on object detection shows consistent superiority compared to those searched on ImageNet classification. The resulting architecture achieves superior performance than hand-crafted networks on COCO with much less FLOPs complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When designing a detection model, NAS can reduce the need for human intervention on the design of the network backbone and anchor boxes [149-155].”
From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [149]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Self-citationMicrosoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2858826 · Cited by 9,556
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356
Self-citationLearning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition
Zoph, B., Vasudevan, V., Shlens, J., & Le, Q. V. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00907 · Cited by 6,875
Generalized Intersection Over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression
Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., & Savarese, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00075 · Cited by 6,612
Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimation
Sun, K., Xiao, B., Liu, D., & Wang, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00584 · Cited by 5,984
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 5,705
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [9][9] Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In ICCV , pages 2961-2969, 2017. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–208 of 208
Reducing the latency and size of a deep CNN model for surface defect detection in manufacturing
Pižurica, N., Pavlović, K., Kovačević, S., & Jovančević, I. (2023) · International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision (QCAV) · doi:10.1117/12.2692962
Soft Labels for Rapid Satellite Object Detection
Ciolino, M., Rosario, G., & Noever, D. A. (2023) · doi:10.5121/csit.2023.131318
Towards Effective Neural Architecture Selection: The Promise of Self-AttentionPreprint
Sun, Z., Hu, Y., Yang, L., Lu, S., Mei, J., & Han, Y. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4634144
Evaluating Learning Potential with Internal States in Deep Neural Networks
Takasaki, S., & Enokida, S. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP) · doi:10.5220/0012298500003660
Binary Neural Architecture Search
Zhang, B., Wang, T., Xu, S. H., & Doermann, D. (2024) · Computational intelligence methods and applications · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-5068-3_3
Mitigating Search Interference With Task-Aware Nested Search
Lee, J., & Kim, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2024.3390996
AFRNet: adaptive feature refinement network
Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Liu, J., Jiang, J. B., & Ma, M. (2024) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-024-03427-3
Object Detection Algorithm and Challenges
Aziz, L., & Ebrahim, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9057-3.ch007 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Yang, T., Zhang, X., Meng, G., Xiao, X., & Sun, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Megvii (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1903.10979
- OpenAlex
- W2948818729
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (#61573352, 91646207, 61773377, 61976208)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- neural architecture search, object detection, backbone networks, ImageNet pre-training, RetinaNet, feature pyramid network, COCO
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
