PreprintCited by 20Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingPhonetics and Phonology Research

Contrastive Predictive Coding Based Feature for Automatic Speaker Verification

Open access
Lai, Cheng-I·2019·arXiv

Abstract

This thesis describes our ongoing work on Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) features for speaker verification. CPC is a recently proposed representation learning framework based on predictive coding and noise contrastive estimation. We focus on incorporating CPC features into the standard automatic speaker verification systems, and we present our methods, experiments, and analysis. This thesis also details necessary background knowledge in past and recent work on automatic speaker verification systems, conventional speech features, and the motivation and techniques behind CPC.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1904.01575

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep networks can effectively learn abstract representations from raw data itself, so no further filtering or denoising is performed on the datasets.

    “As deep networks can effectively learn abstract representations from raw data itself, we perform no further filtering / denoising on the datasets [45].”

    From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lai, C.-I.
Corresponding author
Lai, Cheng-I
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2930682606
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
contrastive predictive coding, speaker verification, representation learning, noise contrastive estimation, predictive coding, speech features, feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review