PreprintCited by 5

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Siamese Encoding and Alignment by Multiscale Learning with Self-Supervision

Mitchell, Eric, Keselj, Stefan, Popovych, Sergiy, Buniatyan, Davit, Seung, H. Sebastian·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We propose a method of aligning a source image to a target image, where the transform is specified by a dense vector field. The two images are encoded as feature hierarchies by siamese convolutional nets. Then a hierarchy of aligner modules computes the transform in a coarse-to-fine recursion. Each module receives as input the transform that was computed by the module at the level above, aligns the source and target encodings at the same level of the hierarchy, and then computes an improved approximation to the transform using a convolutional net. The entire architecture of encoder and aligner nets is trained in a self-supervised manner to minimize the squared error between source and target remaining after alignment. We show that siamese encoding enables more accurate alignment than the image pyramids of SPyNet, a previous deep learning approach to coarse-to-fine alignment. Furthermore, self-supervision applies even without target values for the transform, unlike the strongly supervised SPyNet. We also show that our approach outperforms one-shot approaches to alignment, because the fine pathways in the latter approach may fail to contribute to alignment accuracy when displacements are large. As shown by previous one-shot approaches, good results from self-supervised learning require that the loss function additionally penalize non-smooth transforms. We demonstrate that "masking out" the penalty function near discontinuities leads to correct recovery of non-smooth transforms. Our claims are supported by empirical comparisons using images from serial section electron microscopy of brain tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1904.02643

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In FlyWire, the accuracy of the automated reconstruction was boosted by realigning the serial section images using deep learning.

    “Finally, in FlyWire, the accuracy of the automated reconstruction was boosted by realigning the serial section images using deep learning 19.”

    From FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Guha Balakrishnan, Amy Zhao, Mert R Sabuncu, John Guttag, and Adrian V Dalca. An unsupervised learning model for deformable medical image registration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02604, 2018. · arXiv
  2. Peter J Burt and Edward H Adelson. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. In Readings in Computer Vision, pages 671-679. Elsevier, 1987.
  3. Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, and Yann LeCun. Learning a similarity metric discrimina- tively, with application to face verification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 539-546. IEEE, 2005.
  4. Philipp Fischer, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Eddy Ilg, Philip Häusser, Caner Hazir- bas, Vladimir Golkov, Patrick van der Smagt, Daniel Cremers, and Thomas Brox. Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks. CoRR, abs/1504.06852, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.06852. · arXiv
  5. Tak-Wai Hui, Xiaoou Tang, and Chen Change Loy. Liteflownet: A lightweight con- volutional neural network for optical flow estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8981-8989, 2018.
  6. Angjoo Kanazawa, David W. Jacobs, and Manmohan Chandraker. Warpnet: Weakly supervised matching for single-view reconstruction. CoRR, abs/1604.05592, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05592. · arXiv
  7. Wenjie Luo, Alexander G Schwing, and Raquel Urtasun. Efficient deep learning for stereo matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5695-5703, 2016.
  8. Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, and Andrew Y Ng. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proc. icml, volume 30, page 3, 2013.
  9. Simon Meister, Junhwa Hur, and Stefan Roth. Unflow: Unsupervised learning of op- tical flow with a bidirectional census loss. CoRR, abs/1711.07837, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07837. · arXiv
  10. Birgit Moller and Rafael Garcia. Towards objective quality assessment of image reg- istration results. In International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Ap- plications. VISAPP, 2007. URL http://users.informatik.uni-halle. de/~moeller/pubs/pdf/Moeller07_VISAPP.pdf.
  11. Anurag Ranjan and Michael J Black. Optical flow estimation using a spatial pyramid network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4161-4170, 2017.
  12. Jerome Revaud, Philippe Weinzaepfel, Zaid Harchaoui, and Cordelia Schmid. Epicflow: Edge-preserving interpolation of correspondences for optical flow. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1164-1172, 2015.
  13. Stephan Saalfeld, Richard Fetter, Albert Cardona, and Pavel Tomancak. Elastic volume reconstruction from series of ultra-thin microscopy sections. Nature methods, 9(7): 717, 2012.
  14. Philippe Weinzaepfel, Jerome Revaud, Zaid Harchaoui, and Cordelia Schmid. Deep- flow: Large displacement optical flow with deep matching. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1385-1392. IEEE, 2013.
  15. Donggeun Yoo, Sunggyun Park, Joon-Young Lee, and In So Kweon. Multi-scale pyra- mid pooling for deep convolutional representation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2015 IEEE Conference on, pages 71-80. IEEE, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, E., Keselj, S., Popovych, S., Buniatyan, D., & Seung, H. S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
References
1
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review