Understanding the Behaviors of BERT in Ranking
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies the performances and behaviors of BERT in ranking tasks. We explore several different ways to leverage the pre-trained BERT and fine-tune it on two ranking tasks: MS MARCO passage reranking and TREC Web Track ad hoc document ranking. Experimental results on MS MARCO demonstrate the strong effectiveness of BERT in question-answering focused passage ranking tasks, as well as the fact that BERT is a strong interaction-based seq2seq matching model. Experimental results on TREC show the gaps between the BERT pre-trained on surrounding contexts and the needs of ad hoc document ranking. Analyses illustrate how BERT allocates its attentions between query-document tokens in its Transformer layers, how it prefers semantic matches between paraphrase tokens, and how that differs with the soft match patterns learned by a click-trained neural ranker.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers passed single sentences through BERT and then derive a fixed sized vector by either averaging the outputs or by using the output of the special CLS token.
“To bypass this limitations, researchers passed single sentences through BERT and then derive a fixed sized vector by either averaging the outputs (similar to average word embeddings) or by using the output of the special CLS token (for example: May et al. (2019); Zhang et al. (2019); Qiao et al. (2019)).”
From Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks (2019) · cites this paper as Qiao et al. (2019)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Nogueira, R., & Cho, K. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04085 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Zhuyun Dai, Chenyan Xiong, Jamie Callan, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2018. Convolutional Neural Networks for Soft-Matching N-Grams in Ad-hoc Search. In Proceedings of WSDM 2018. ACM, 126-134.
- Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W Bruce Croft. 2016. A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of CIKM 2016. ACM, 55-64.
- Liang Pang, Yanyan Lan, Jiafeng Guo, Jun Xu, Jingfang Xu, and Xueqi Cheng. 2017. Deeprank: A new deep architecture for relevance ranking in information retrieval. In Proceedings of CIKM 2017. ACM, 257-266.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of NeuIPS 2017. 5998-6008.
- Chenyan Xiong, Zhuyun Dai, Jamie Callan, Zhiyuan Liu, and Russell Power. 2017. End-to-end neural ad-hoc ranking with kernel pooling. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2017. ACM, 55-64.
- Hamed Zamani and W Bruce Croft. 2017. Relevance-based word embedding. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2017. ACM, 505-514.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 · Cited by 12,778 · see citing works
Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval
Xiong, L., Xiong, C., Li, Y., Tang, K.-F., Liu, J., Bennett, P., Ahmed, J., & Overwijk, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00808 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationDense Text Retrieval Based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey
Zhao, W. X., Liu, J., Ren, R., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3637870 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“To implement the reranker, a typical approach is to employ the cross-encoder as the ranking model, showing substantial improvements over the traditional methods [193], [272]–[274].”
MethodSentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.10084 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
R2-D2: A Modular Baseline for Open-Domain Question Answering
Fajcik, M., Docekal, M., Ondrej, K., & Smrz, P. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.73 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Vakulenko, S., Longpre, S., Tu, Z., & Anantha, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Search-Oriented Conversational AI (SCAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.scai-1.2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qiao, Y., Xiong, C., Liu, Z., & Liu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1904.07531
- OpenAlex
- W2938224028
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 11
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- BERT, neural ranking, passage reranking, MS MARCO, TREC Web Track, attention analysis, transformer layers, question answering, query-document matching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
