PreprintCited by 389Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCloud Data Security SolutionsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Gaussian Differential Privacy

Open access
Dong, Jinshuo, Roth, Aaron, Su, Weijie J.·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Differential privacy has seen remarkable success as a rigorous and practical formalization of data privacy in the past decade. This privacy definition and its divergence based relaxations, however, have several acknowledged weaknesses, either in handling composition of private algorithms or in analyzing important primitives like privacy amplification by subsampling. Inspired by the hypothesis testing formulation of privacy, this paper proposes a new relaxation, which we term `$f$-differential privacy' ($f$-DP). This notion of privacy has a number of appealing properties and, in particular, avoids difficulties associated with divergence based relaxations. First, $f$-DP preserves the hypothesis testing interpretation. In addition, $f$-DP allows for lossless reasoning about composition in an algebraic fashion. Moreover, we provide a powerful technique to import existing results proven for original DP to $f$-DP and, as an application, obtain a simple subsampling theorem for $f$-DP. In addition to the above findings, we introduce a canonical single-parameter family of privacy notions within the $f$-DP class that is referred to as `Gaussian differential privacy' (GDP), defined based on testing two shifted Gaussians. GDP is focal among the $f$-DP class because of a central limit theorem we prove. More precisely, the privacy guarantees of \emph{any} hypothesis testing based definition of privacy (including original DP) converges to GDP in the limit under composition. The CLT also yields a computationally inexpensive tool for analyzing the exact composition of private algorithms. Taken together, this collection of attractive properties render $f$-DP a mathematically coherent, analytically tractable, and versatile framework for private data analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the use of the tools we develop by giving an improved privacy analysis of noisy stochastic gradient descent.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1905.02383

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementations of differential privacy range from simple random shuffling of the input data to the introduction of noise to the dataset, including Gaussian DP with the benefit of better interpretability.

    “Implementations range from simple random shuffling of the input data 57 to the introduction of noise to the dataset (Gaussian DP 58 with the benefit of better interpretability).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 389

Authors
Dong, J., Roth, A., & Su, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Su, Weijie J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
3-37
ISSN
1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189333525
Cited by
389
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1253345, 1847415, 1763314)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Brandeis University
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
differential privacy, Gaussian differential privacy, hypothesis testing, Berry-Esseen theorem, privacy guarantees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review