The DOI matches its DataCite record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformalized Quantile Regression
Open accessAbstract
Conformal prediction is a technique for constructing prediction intervals that attain valid coverage in finite samples, without making distributional assumptions. Despite this appeal, existing conformal methods can be unnecessarily conservative because they form intervals of constant or weakly varying length across the input space. In this paper we propose a new method that is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. It combines conformal prediction with classical quantile regression, inheriting the advantages of both. We establish a theoretical guarantee of valid coverage, supplemented by extensive experiments on popular regression datasets. We compare the efficiency of conformalized quantile regression to other conformal methods, showing that our method tends to produce shorter intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This approach maintains the coverage guarantee of CP while often producing tighter, more locally adaptive intervals compared to residual-based methods, particularly in heteroscedastic settings [8].”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the core of our approach is Conformal RCA , which leverages split conformal prediction [6]-[8] to produce statistically grounded confidence intervals for segmentation quality scores.”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Assuming exchangeability between the test sample and calibration set, the constructed interval provides the marginal coverage guarantee stated in Theorem 3, as shown in [8].”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Koenker, R. W., & Bassett, G. W. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 14,611
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471
Koenker, R. W., & Hallock, K. F. (2001) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143 · Cited by 4,571
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.01474 · Cited by 3,666
Meinshausen, N. (2006) · Cited by 1,522
Algorithmic Learning in a Random World
(2005) · doi:10.1007/b106715 · Cited by 1,119
Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression
Lei, J., G’Sell, M., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R. J., & Wasserman, L. (2018) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1307116 · Cited by 1,049
Distribution‐free prediction bands for non‐parametric regression
Lei, J., & Wasserman, L. (2014) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12021 · Cited by 525
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [7][7] Harris Papadopoulos, Alex Gammerman, and Volodya Vovk. Normalized nonconformity measures for regression conformal prediction. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications , pages 64-69, 2008. -
- [20][20] James W. Taylor. A quantile regression neural network approach to estimating the conditional density of multiperiod returns. Journal of Forecasting , 19(4):299-311, 2000. -
- [35][35] Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):1929-1958, 2014. -
- [37][37] Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, and Alfred Galichon. Quantile and probability curves without crossing. Econometrica , 78(3):1093-1125, 2010. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conformal prediction beyond exchangeability
Barber, R. F., Candès, E. J., Ramdas, A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2023) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/23-aos2276 · Cited by 395
“Conformal prediction was pioneered by Vladimir Vovk and various collaborators in the early 2000s; the book by Vovk et al. [2005] details their advances and remains a critical resource.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLambert, B., Forbes, F., Doyle, S., Dehaene, H., & Michel Dojat, D. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102830 · Cited by 353
Classifier calibration: a survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilities
Silva Filho, T., Song, H., Perello-Nieto, M., Santos-Rodriguez, R., Kull, M., & Flach, P. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06336-7 · Cited by 228
“Conformal prediction (Vovk et al., 2005; Romano et al., 2019; Angelopoulos & Bates, 2021) is another area closely related to the topic of probability calibration.”
BackgroundDistribution-free, Risk-controlling Prediction Sets
Bates, S., Angelopoulos, A., Lei, L., Malik, J., & Jordan, M. (2021) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3478535 · Cited by 144
Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects
Lei, L., & Candès, E. J. (2021) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12445 · Cited by 166
“For instance, with estimates q̂αlo(x) and q̂αhi(x) of the αlo-th and αhi-th conditional quantiles of Y | X = x, the conformal quantile regression (CQR) introduced in Romano et al. [2019] as a variant of the standard conformal inference, would produce an interval estimate of the form”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Romano, Y., Patterson, E., & Candès, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 3538-3548
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.03222
- OpenAlex
- W2946063682
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f9dc6f8519e927d948a13aa7ae0df336f443eb9
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- ISEF Foundation
- Iran Science Elites Federation
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2712, N00014)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-17, W911NF-17-1-0304, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- conformal prediction, quantile regression, prediction intervals, heteroscedasticity, coverage guarantees, interval length, nonparametric inference, conformalized quantile regression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
