PreprintCited by 514Numerical Methods and AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 34 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study of BFLOAT16 for Deep Learning Training

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study demonstrating the efficacy of the Brain Floating Point (BFLOAT16) half-precision format for Deep Learning training across image classification, speech recognition, language modeling, generative networks and industrial recommendation systems. BFLOAT16 is attractive for Deep Learning training for two reasons: the range of values it can represent is the same as that of IEEE 754 floating-point format (FP32) and conversion to/from FP32 is simple. Maintaining the same range as FP32 is important to ensure that no hyper-parameter tuning is required for convergence; e.g., IEEE 754 compliant half-precision floating point (FP16) requires hyper-parameter tuning. In this paper, we discuss the flow of tensors and various key operations in mixed precision training, and delve into details of operations, such as the rounding modes for converting FP32 tensors to BFLOAT16. We have implemented a method to emulate BFLOAT16 operations in Tensorflow, Caffe2, IntelCaffe, and Neon for our experiments. Our results show that deep learning training using BFLOAT16 tensors achieves the same state-of-the-art (SOTA) results across domains as FP32 tensors in the same number of iterations and with no changes to hyper-parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1905.12322

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [10][10] Jeffrey Dean, Greg Corrado, Rajat Monga, Kai Chen, Matthieu Devin, Mark Mao, Andrew Senior, Paul Tucker, Ke Yang, Quoc V Le, et al. Large scale distributed deep networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1223-1231, 2012. -
  2. [15][15] Boris Ginsburg, Sergei Nikolaev, and Paulius Micikevicius. Training of deep networks with half-precision float. NVidia GPU Technology Conference , 2017. -
  3. [34][34] Matthew Richardson, Ewa Dominowska, and Robert Ragno. Predicting clicks: Estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web , WWW'07, pages 521-530, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. -
  4. [37][37] Vincent Vanhoucke, Andrew Senior, and Mark Z Mao. Improving the speed of neural networks on CPUs. In Proc. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS Workshop , volume 1, 2011. -
  5. [43][43] Jian Zhang, Jiyan Yang, and Hector Yuen. Training with low-precision embedding tables. In Systems for Machine Learning Workshop at NeurIPS 2018 . 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 514

Metadata

Authors
Kalamkar, D., Mudigere, D., Mellempudi, N., Das, D., Banerjee, K., Avancha, S., Vooturi, D. T., Jammalamadaka, N., Huang, J., Yuen, H., Yang, J., Park, J., Heinecke, A., Georganas, E., Srinivasan, S., Kundu, A., Smelyanskiy, M., Kaul, B., & Dubey, P.
Affiliations
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947629474
Cited by
169
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
bfloat16, half-precision floating-point, mixed-precision training, deep learning training, rounding modes, image classification, speech recognition, language modeling, generative neural networks, recommender systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review