The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Adaptation of Pretrained Transformers for Abstractive Summarization
Abstract
Large-scale learning of transformer language models has yielded improvements on a variety of natural language understanding tasks. Whether they can be effectively adapted for summarization, however, has been less explored, as the learned representations are less seamlessly integrated into existing neural text production architectures. In this work, we propose two solutions for efficiently adapting pretrained transformer language models as text summarizers: source embeddings and domain-adaptive training. We test these solutions on three abstractive summarization datasets, achieving new state of the art performance on two of them. Finally, we show that these improvements are achieved by producing more focused summaries with fewer superfluous and that performance improvements are more pronounced on more abstractive datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In many downstream applications, e.g., dialogue systems [76] and summarization models [29], LMs are fi netuned on task-specific data.”
From Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks
See, A., Liu, P. J., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1099 · Cited by 3,775
Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.11 · Cited by 2,264
Learned in Translation: Contextualized Word Vectors
McCann, B., Bradbury, J., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.00107 · Cited by 572
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Asli Celikyilmaz, Antoine Bosselut, Xiaodong He, and Yejin Choi. 2018. Deep communicating agents for abstractive summarization. In NAACL.
- Yen-Chun Chen and Mohit Bansal. 2018. Fast abstractive summarization with reinforce-selected sentence rewriting. In ACL.
- Jianpeng Cheng and Mirella Lapata. 2016. Neural summarization by extracting sentences and words. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.07252. · arXiv
- Andrew M. Dai and Quoc V. Le. 2015. Semi-supervised sequence learning. In NIPS.
- Sebastian Gehrmann, Yuntian Deng, and Alexander M Rush. 2018. Bottom-up abstractive summarization. In EMNLP.
- Max Grusky, Mor Naaman, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. Newsroom: A dataset of 1.3 million summaries with diverse extractive strategies. In NAACL.
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomas Kocisky, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1693-1701.
- Byeongchang Kim, Hyunwoo Kim, and Gunhee Kim. 2018. Abstractive summarization of reddit posts with multi-level memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00783. · arXiv
- Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh, Etienne Pot, Ben Goodrich, Ryan Sepassi, Lukasz Kaiser, and Noam Shazeer. 2018. Generating wikipedia by summarizing long sequences. In ICLR.
- Ramesh Nallapati, Feifei Zhai, and Bowen Zhou. 2017. Summarunner: A recurrent neural network based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
- Shashi Narayan, Shay B Cohen, and Mirella Lapata. 2018. Don't give me the details, just the summary! topic-aware convolutional neural networks for extreme summarization. In EMNLP.
- Ramakanth Pasunuru and Mohit Bansal. 2018. Multi-reward reinforced summarization with saliency and entailment. In ACL.
- Romain Paulus, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2018. A deep reinforced model for abstractive summarization. In ICLR.
- Tian Shi, Yaser Keneshloo, Naren Ramakrishnan, and Chandan K Reddy. 2018. Neural abstrac- tive text summarization with sequence-to-sequence models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02303. · arXiv
- Simeng Sun, Ori Shapira, Ido Dagan, and Ani Nenkova. 2019. How to compare summarizers without target length? pitfalls, solutions and re-examination of the neural summarization literature. In Proceedings of NAACL 2019 Workshop on Optimizing and Evaluating Neural Language Generation (NeuralGen).
- Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan, and Jianguo Xiao. 2017. Abstractive document summarization with a graph-based attentional neural model. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), volume 1, pages 1171- 1181.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 5998-6008.
- Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2018. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint 1804.07461. · arXiv
Cited by
Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models
Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., Jagielski, M., Herbert-Voss, A., Lee, K., Roberts, A., Brown, T., Song, D., Erlingsson, U., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07805 · Cited by 727
MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
Chen, Z., Cano, A. H., Romanou, A., Bonnet, A., Matoba, K., Salvi, F., Pagliardini, M., Fan, S., Köpf, A., Mohtashami, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.16079 · Cited by 122
Self-citationDesigning Home Automation Routines Using an LLM-Based Chatbot
Giudici, M., Padalino, L., Paolino, G., Paratici, I., Pascu, A. I., & Garzotto, F. (2024) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs8030043 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoang, A., Bosselut, A., Celikyilmaz, A., & Choi, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1906.00138
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
