OpenEI: An Open Framework for Edge Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
In the last five years, edge computing has attracted tremendous attention from industry and academia due to its promise to reduce latency, save bandwidth, improve availability, and protect data privacy to keep data secure. At the same time, we have witnessed the proliferation of AI algorithms and models which accelerate the successful deployment of intelligence mainly in cloud services. These two trends, combined together, have created a new horizon: Edge Intelligence (EI). The development of EI requires much attention from both the computer systems research community and the AI community to meet these demands. However, existing computing techniques used in the cloud are not applicable to edge computing directly due to the diversity of computing sources and the distribution of data sources. We envision that there missing a framework that can be rapidly deployed on edge and enable edge AI capabilities. To address this challenge, in this paper we first present the definition and a systematic review of EI. Then, we introduce an Open Framework for Edge Intelligence (OpenEI), which is a lightweight software platform to equip edges with intelligent processing and data sharing capability. We analyze four fundamental EI techniques which are used to build OpenEI and identify several open problems based on potential research directions. Finally, four typical application scenarios enabled by OpenEI are presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OpenEI defines each DL algorithm as a four-element tuple to evaluate Edge DL capability of target hardware and can select a matched model for a specific edge platform online.
“OpenEI [183] defines each DL algorithm as a four-element tuple ¡Accuracy, Latency, Energy, Memory Footprint¿ to evaluate the Edge DL capability of the target hardware platform.Based on such tuple, OpenEI can select a matched model for a specific edge platform based on different Edge DL capabilities in an online manner.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [183]
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
“OpenEI [183] defines each DL algorithm as a four-element tuple ¡Accuracy, Latency, Energy, Memory Footprint¿ to evaluate the Edge DL capability of the target hardware platform.”
Method
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Lu, S., Liu, L., Xu, L., & Shi, W.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1840-1851
- arXiv
- 1906.01864
- OpenAlex
- W2982656930
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 16.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Keywords
- edge AI, edge computing, software platform, distributed data processing, data sharing, latency reduction, data privacy, open problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review