The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Multimodal Fixed-Point Weights using Gradient Descent
Abstract
Due to their high computational complexity, deep neural networks are still limited to powerful processing units. To promote a reduced model complexity by dint of low-bit fixed-point quantization, we propose a gradient-based optimization strategy to generate a symmetric mixture of Gaussian modes (SGM) where each mode belongs to a particular quantization stage. We achieve 2-bit state-of-the-art performance and illustrate the model's ability for self-dependent weight adaptation during training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, these xed-point-based quantization studies have the advantage of easy HW implementation, but it is dif cult to minimize performance degradation, so these studies have been conducted with the goal of applying to relatively simple image classi cation. Consequently, when they are applied to object detection, there is a problem that performance degradation is extremely signi cant.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Enderich et al. [25] change the distribution of weights multimodally on a xed-point format but did not use a method to remove bias of the weight distribution, making it dif cult to use in networks where the distribution of weights is not located on a zero basis.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as Enderich et al. [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Yann Lecun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436- 444, 2015.
- Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR, abs/1409.1556, 2014. · arXiv
- Fengfu Li and Bin Liu. Ternary weight networks. CoRR, abs/1605.04711, 2016. · arXiv
- Chenzhuo Zhu, Song Han, Huizi Mao, and William J. Dally. Trained ternary quantization. CoRR, abs/1612.01064, 2016. · arXiv
- Aojun Zhou, Anbang Yao, Kuan Wang, and Yurong Chen. Explicit loss-error-aware quantization for low-bit deep neural networks. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2018.
- Matthieu Courbariaux, Yoshua Bengio, and Jean-Pierre David. Binaryconnect: Training deep neural networks with binary weights during propagations. CoRR, 2015.
- Aojun Zhou, Anbang Yao, Yiwen Guo, Lin Xu, and Yurong Chen. Incremental network quantization: Towards lossless cnns with low-precision weights. CoRR, 2017.
- Karen Ullrich, Edward Meeds, and Max Welling. Soft weight-sharing for neural network compression. CoRR, abs/1702.04008, 2017. · arXiv
- Christos Louizos, Karen Ullrich, and Max Welling. Bayesian compression for deep learn- ing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pages 3288-3298.
- Jan Achterhold, Jan Mathias Koehler, Anke Schmeink, and Tim Genewein. Variational network quantization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
- Vivienne Sze, Yu-Hsin Chen, Tien-Ju Yang, and Joel S. Emer. Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey. CoRR, abs/1703.09039, 2017. · arXiv
- Anders Krogh and John A. Hertz. A simple weight decay can improve generalization. In J. E. Moody, S. J. Hanson, and R. P. Lippmann, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 4, pages 950-957.
- Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. CoRR, abs/1608.06993, 2016. · arXiv
- ESANN 2019 proceedings, European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning. Bruges (Belgium), 24-26 April 2019, i6doc.com publ., ISBN 978-287-587-065-0. Available from http://www.i6doc.com/en/.
Cited by
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3054879 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Enderich, L., Timm, F., Rosenbaum, L., & Burgard, W.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1907.07220
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
