The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accelerating Reinforcement Learning through GPU Atari Emulation
Abstract
We introduce CuLE (CUDA Learning Environment), a CUDA port of the Atari Learning Environment (ALE) which is used for the development of deep reinforcement algorithms. CuLE overcomes many limitations of existing CPU-based emulators and scales naturally to multiple GPUs. It leverages GPU parallelization to run thousands of games simultaneously and it renders frames directly on the GPU, to avoid the bottleneck arising from the limited CPU-GPU communication bandwidth. CuLE generates up to 155M frames per hour on a single GPU, a finding previously achieved only through a cluster of CPUs. Beyond highlighting the differences between CPU and GPU emulators in the context of reinforcement learning, we show how to leverage the high throughput of CuLE by effective batching of the training data, and show accelerated convergence for A2C+V-trace. CuLE is available at https://github.com/NVLabs/cule .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dalton et al. (2019) improve the efficiency of Atari experiments by keeping resources on the GPU, avoiding energy and time overheads from moving memory back and forth.
“Dalton et al. (2019) improve the efficiency of Atari experiments by keeping resources on the GPU (and thus avoiding energy and time overheads from moving memory back and forth).”
From Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Dalton et al. (2019)
Several works have developed efficient versions of reinforcement learning environments that significantly reduce run-times.
“Several works have developed efficient versions of RL environments which reduce run-times significantly.”
From Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Dalton et al. (2019)
Citations
Cites
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Machado, M. C., Bellemare, M. G., Talvitie, E., Veness, J., Hausknecht, M., & Bowling, M. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5699 · Cited by 359
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning
Henderson, P., Hu, J., Romoff, J., Brunskill, E., Jurafsky, D., & Pineau, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05651 · Cited by 393
Scaling Scaling Laws with Board Games
Jones, A. L. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.03113 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Dalton, S., Frosio, I., & Garland, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1907.08467
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
