Movement science needs different pose tracking algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Over the last decade, computer science has made progress towards extracting body pose from single camera photographs or videos. This promises to enable movement science to detect disease, quantify movement performance, and take the science out of the lab into the real world. However, current pose tracking algorithms fall short of the needs of movement science; the types of movement data that matter are poorly estimated. For instance, the metrics currently used for evaluating pose tracking algorithms use noisy hand-labeled ground truth data and do not prioritize precision of relevant variables like three-dimensional position, velocity, acceleration, and forces which are crucial for movement science. Here, we introduce the scientific disciplines that use movement data, the types of data they need, and discuss the changes needed to make pose tracking truly transformative for movement science.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such imaging approaches may lack the necessary precision and resolution to accurately track natural motions of neonates and young children, whose body configurations differ from adults and are often not represented substantially in training data for pose estimation algorithms.
“Such approaches may also lack the necessary precision and resolution to accurately track natural motions of neonates and young children, whose body configurations differ from adults and are often not represented substantially in training data for pose estimation algorithms (19).”
From Miniaturized wireless, skin-integrated sensor networks for quantifying full-body movement behaviors and vital signs in infants (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 88 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Seethapathi, N., Wang, S., Saluja, R., Blohm, G., & Kording, K. P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1907.10226
- OpenAlex
- W2963500285
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- movement science, ground truth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
