CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 3Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular StructureProcess Optimization and Integration

Generic approach for the modeling of liquefied thermochemical products and biomass heat of formation. Case study: HTL biocrude, Pyrolysis oil and assessment of energy requirements

Open access
Lozano, Eliana M., Pedersen, Thomas H., Rosendahl, Lasse·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1908.00799arXiv 1908.00799
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A generic approach is proposed for the estimation of advanced biocrudes properties from liquefied biomass and the enthalpy of formation of biomass feedstocks applicable to the modeling of biomass conversion processes where the exact stoichiometry and kinetics are unknown,such as pyrolysis, solvolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) . The enthalpy of formation of the biomass is estimated through a direct correlation based on ultimate and proximate analysis, whose parameters can easily be fitted with experimental data available from sources such as the Phillys database for different biomass types and implemented in process simulators such as Aspen Plus. For the biocrude modeling, a multi-objective optimization model is proposed that refines the selection of model compounds to match measured bulk thermochemical and physical properties. Parameter fitting and multi-objective optimization were both performed in Matlab and the codes are available in the supplementary material. As a case study, the optimization model was applied to two different oils obtained via HTL and pyrolysis of woody biomass. The first case was further studied in order to estimate the impact of the proposed models in the energy requirements. The process was implemented in Aspen Plus but the methodology is applicable to other simulation tools. The results show that the methods for estimating enthalpies of formation have a high impact on the energy balance and consequently the models developed allow a more accurate estimation of the energy requirement in the reactor. This is a key element in making accurate heat integration and techno-economic analyses of thermochemical conversion processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1908.00799

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. A. Friedl, E. P. (2005). Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition. Analytica Chimica Acta, 544 (1-2), 191-198. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.041 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adeyemi, I., & Janajreh, I. (2015). Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model. Renewable Energy, 82 , 77-84. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.073 · DOI
  3. Aspen Technology Inc. (2006). User manual: Aspen Physical Property Methods. Cambridge, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
  4. Baratieri, M., Baggio, P., Fiori, L., & Grigiante, M. (2008). Biomass as an energy source: Thermodynamic constraints on the performance of the conversion process. Bioresource Technology, 99 (15), 7063-7073. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.006 · DOI
  5. Basu, P. &. (2010). Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis: Practical Design and Theory. Academic Press.
  6. Bates, R. B., & Ghoniem, A. F. (2013). Biomass torrefaction: Modeling of reaction thermochemistry. Bioresource Technology, 134 , 331-340. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.158 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benson, S. (1976). Thermochemical kinetics. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Channiwala, S., & Parikh, P. (2002). A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel, 81 (8), 10501063. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4 · DOI
  9. Demirbas, A. (2000). Mechanisms of liquefaction and pyrolysis reactions of biomass. Energy conversion and management, 41 (6), 633-646. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00130-2 · DOI
  10. Demirbas, A., & Al-Ghamdi, K. (2015). Relationships between Specific Gravities and Higher Heating Values of Petroleum components. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33 (6), 732-740. doi:10.1080/10916466.2015.1007384 · DOI
  11. Demirbas, F. (2010). Characterization of Bio-oils from Spruce Wood (Picea orientalis L.) via Pyrolysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 32 (10), 909-916. doi:10.1080/15567030903059970 · DOI
  12. Fassinou, W. F., Steene, L. V., Toure, S., & Martin, E. (2011). What correlation is appropriate to evaluate biodiesels and vegetable oils higher heating value (HHV)? Fuel (Guildford), 90 (11), 3398-3403. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.04.025 · DOI
  13. Hankalin, V. A. (2009). On thermal properties of a pyrolysing wood particle. In Finnish-Swedish Flame Days 2009 (p. 16p). Naantali, Finland : Conference Contribution.
  14. Jensen, F. (2016). Introduction to Computational Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
  15. La Villetta, M., Costa, M., & Massarottia, N. (2017). Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74 , 71-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.027 · DOI
  16. Pedersen, T., Hansen, N., Miralles, O., Villamar, D., & Rosendahl, L. (2017). Renewable hydrocarbon fuels from hydrothermal liquefaction: A techno-economic analysis. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12 , 213-223. doi:10.1002/bbb.1831 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pedersen, T., Jensen, C., Sandström, L., & Rosendahl, L. (2017). Full characterization of compounds obtained from fractional distillation and upgrading of a HTL biocrude. Applied Energy, 202 , 408-419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.167 · DOI
  18. Peduzzi, E., Boissonnet, G., & Maréchal, F. (2016). Biomass modelling: Estimating thermodynamic properties from the elemental composition. Fuel, 181 , 207-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.111 · DOI
  19. Sharifzadeh, M., Richard, C. J., & Shah, N. (2017). Modelling the kinetics of pyrolysis oil hydrothermal upgrading based on the connectivity of oxygen atoms, quantified by 31P-NMR. Biomass and Bioenergy, 98 , 272-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.022 · DOI
  20. Sheehan, J. D., & Savage, P. E. (2017). Modeling the effects of microalga biochemical content on the kinetics and biocrude yields from hydrothermal liquefaction. Bioresource Technology, 239 , 144-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.013 · DOI
  21. Stephen G. Gopaul, A. D. (2014). Chemical looping gasification for hydrogen production: A comparison of two unique processes simulated using ASPEN Plus. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39 (11), 5804-5817. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.178 · DOI
  22. Teixeira, A. L., Leal, J. P., & Falcao, A. O. (2013). Random forests for feature selection in QSPR models - an application for predicting standard enthalpy of formation of hydrocarbons. Journal of Cheminformatics, 5 . doi:10.1186/1758-2946-5-9 · DOI
  23. Tzanetis, K., Posada, J., & Ramirez, A. (2017). Analysis of biomass hydrothermal liquefaction and biocrude-oil upgrading for renewable jet fuel production: The impact of reaction conditions on production costs and GHG emissions performance. Renewable Energy, 113 , 1388-1398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.104 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Valdez, P. J., Tocco, V. J., & Savage, P. E. (2014). A general kinetic model for the hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae. Bioresource Technology, 163 , 123-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.013 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vasiliu, M., Guynn, K., & Dixon, D. A. (2011). Prediction of the Thermodynamic Properties of Key Products and Intermediates from Biomass. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 115 (31), 15686-15702. doi:10.1021/jp204243m · DOI
  26. Vasiliu, M., Jones, A. J., Guynn, K., & Dixon, D. A. (2012). Prediction of the Thermodynamic Properties of Key Products and Intermediates from Biomass. II. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 116 (39), 20738-20754. doi:10.1021/jp306596d · DOI
  27. Vatani, A., Mehrpooya, M., & Gharagheizi, F. (2007). Prediction of Standard Enthalpy of Formation by a QSPR Model. International Journal of molecular sciences, 8 , 407-432. doi: 10.3390/i8050407 · DOI
  28. Villeda, J. V., Dahmen, M., Hechinger, M., & Voll, A. (2015). Towards Model-Based Design of Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass. In P. S. Klaas M., Fuels From Biomass: An Interdisciplinary Approach. BrenaRo 2011. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Vol. 129, p. 198). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-662-45425-1\_12 · DOI
  29. Yang, H., Kudo, S., Kuo, H. P., Norinaga, K., Mori, A., & Mašek, O. e. (2013). Estimation of Enthalpy of Bio-Oil Vapor and Heat Required for Pyrolysis of Biomass. Energy & Fuels, 27 (5), 2675-2686. doi:10.1021/ef400199z · DOI
  30. Yin, C. Y. (2011). Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel (Guildford) (90 (3)), 1128-1132. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.031 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lozano, E. M., Pedersen, T. H., & Rosendahl, L.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1908.00799
arXiv
1908.00799
OpenAlex
W2966008565
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
Keywords
hydrothermal liquefaction, biocrude, bio-oil, enthalpy of formation, biomass, multi-objective optimization, energy requirements, woody biomass, heat integration, techno-economic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review