The DOI matches its DataCite record.
The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curve
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning methods operate in regimes that defy the traditional statistical mindset. Neural network architectures often contain more parameters than training samples, and are so rich that they can interpolate the observed labels, even if the latter are replaced by pure noise. Despite their huge complexity, the same architectures achieve small generalization error on real data. This phenomenon has been rationalized in terms of a so-called `double descent' curve. As the model complexity increases, the test error follows the usual U-shaped curve at the beginning, first decreasing and then peaking around the interpolation threshold (when the model achieves vanishing training error). However, it descends again as model complexity exceeds this threshold. The global minimum of the test error is found above the interpolation threshold, often in the extreme overparametrization regime in which the number of parameters is much larger than the number of samples. Far from being a peculiar property of deep neural networks, elements of this behavior have been demonstrated in much simpler settings, including linear regression with random covariates. In this paper we consider the problem of learning an unknown function over the $d$-dimensional sphere $\mathbb S^{d-1}$, from $n$ i.i.d. samples $(\boldsymbol x_i, y_i)\in \mathbb S^{d-1} \times \mathbb R$, $i\le n$. We perform ridge regression on $N$ random features of the form $σ(\boldsymbol w_a^{\mathsf T} \boldsymbol x)$, $a\le N$. This can be equivalently described as a two-layers neural network with random first-layer weights. We compute the precise asymptotics of the test error, in the limit $N,n,d\to \infty$ with $N/d$ and $n/d$ fixed. This provides the first analytically tractable model that captures all the features of the double descent phenomenon without assuming ad hoc misspecification structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In general, this situation manifests even without label noise for linear models (Mei and Montanari 2019), and occurs whenever there is model mis-specification between the structure of the true distribution and the model family.”
From Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt* (2021) · cites this paper as Mei and Montanari 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The above intuition is theoretically justified for linear models.”
From Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt* (2021) · cites this paper as Mei and Montanari 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Sanjeev Arora, Simon S Du, Wei Hu, Zhiyuan Li, and Ruosong Wang, Fine-grained anal- ysis of optimization and generalization for overparameterized two-layer neural networks, arXiv:1901.08584 (2019). · arXiv
- Greg W. Anderson, Alice Guionnet, and Ofer Zeitouni, An introduction to random matrices, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
- Ahmed Alaoui and Michael W Mahoney, Fast randomized kernel ridge regression with statistical guarantees, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015, pp. 775-783.
- Dyego Araújo, Roberto I Oliveira, and Daniel Yukimura, A mean-field limit for certain deep neural networks, arXiv:1906.00193 (2019). · arXiv
- Madhu S Advani and Andrew M Saxe, High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networks, arXiv:1710.03667 (2017). · arXiv
- Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, and Yingyu Liang, Learning and generalization in overparame- terized neural networks, going beyond two layers, arXiv:1811.04918 (2018). · arXiv
- Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, and Zhao Song, A convergence theory for deep learning via over-parameterization, arXiv:1811.03962 (2018). · arXiv
- Francis Bach, Sharp analysis of low-rank kernel matrix approximations, Conference on Learning Theory, 2013, pp. 185-209.
- Breaking the curse of dimensionality with convex neural networks, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 18 (2017), no. 1, 629-681.
- On the equivalence between kernel quadrature rules and random feature expansions, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 18 (2017), no. 1, 714-751.
- Mikhail Belkin, Daniel Hsu, Siyuan Ma, and Soumik Mandal, Reconciling modern machine learning and the bias-variance trade-off, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (2019), 15849-15854.
- Mikhail Belkin, Daniel Hsu, and Ji Xu, Two models of double descent for weak features, arXiv:1903.07571, 2019. · arXiv
- Peter L Bartlett, Philip M Long, Gábor Lugosi, and Alexander Tsigler, Benign overfitting in linear regression, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020).
- Mikhail Belkin, Siyuan Ma, and Soumik Mandal, To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learning, arXiv:1802.01396, 2018. · arXiv
- Mikhail Belkin, Alexander Rakhlin, and Alexandre B Tsybakov, Does data interpolation con- tradict statistical optimality?, The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2019, pp. 1611-1619.
- Zhidong Bai and Jack W Silverstein, Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, vol. 20, Springer, 2010.
- Lenaic Chizat and Francis Bach, A note on lazy training in supervised differentiable program- ming, arXiv:1812.07956 (2018). · arXiv
- On the global convergence of gradient descent for over-parameterized models using op- timal transport, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2018, pp. 3036-3046.
- Amit Daniely, Sgd learns the conjugate kernel class of the network, Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 2422-2430.
- Amit Daniely, Roy Frostig, and Yoram Singer, Toward deeper understanding of neural networks: The power of initialization and a dual view on expressivity, Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016, pp. 2253-2261.
- David L Donoho and Iain M Johnstone, Projection-based approximation and a duality with kernel methods, The Annals of Statistics (1989), 58-106.
- Xialiang Dou and Tengyuan Liang, Training neural networks as learning data-adaptive kernels: Provable representation and approximation benefits, arXiv:1901.07114 (2019). · arXiv
- Simon S Du, Jason D Lee, Haochuan Li, Liwei Wang, and Xiyu Zhai, Gradient descent finds global minima of deep neural networks, arXiv:1811.03804 (2018). · arXiv
- Yash Deshpande and Andrea Montanari, Sparse pca via covariance thresholding, Journal of Machine Learning Research 17 (2016), 1-41.
- Simon S Du, Xiyu Zhai, Barnabas Poczos, and Aarti Singh, Gradient descent provably optimizes over-parameterized neural networks, arXiv:1810.02054 (2018). · arXiv
- Costas Efthimiou and Christopher Frye, Spherical harmonics in p dimensions, World Scientific, 2014.
- Noureddine El Karoui, The spectrum of kernel random matrices, The Annals of Statistics 38 (2010), no. 1, 1-50.
- Adrià Garriga-Alonso, Laurence Aitchison, and Carl Edward Rasmussen, Deep convolutional networks as shallow gaussian processes, arXiv:1808.05587 (2018). · arXiv
- Mario Geiger, Arthur Jacot, Stefano Spigler, Franck Gabriel, Levent Sagun, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Giulio Biroli, Clément Hongler, and Matthieu Wyart, Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning, arXiv:1901.01608 (2019). · arXiv
- Behrooz Ghorbani, Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, and Andrea Montanari, Linearized two- layers neural networks in high dimension, arXiv:1904.12191 (2019). · arXiv
- Tamir Hazan and Tommi Jaakkola, Steps toward deep kernel methods from infinite neural net- works, arXiv:1508.05133 (2015). · arXiv
- Trevor Hastie, Andrea Montanari, Saharon Rosset, and Ryan J Tibshirani, Surprises in high- dimensional ridgeless least squares interpolation, arXiv:1903.08560 (2019). · arXiv
- J William Helton, Tobias Mai, and Roland Speicher, Applications of realizations (aka lineariza- tions) to free probability, Journal of Functional Analysis 274 (2018), no. 1, 1-79.
- Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman, The elements of statistical learning, Springer, 2009.
- Arthur Jacot, Franck Gabriel, and Clément Hongler, Neural tangent kernel: Convergence and generalization in neural networks, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2018, pp. 8571-8580.
- Adel Javanmard, Marco Mondelli, and Andrea Montanari, Analysis of a two-layer neural net- work via displacement convexity, arXiv:1901.01375 (2019). · arXiv
- Dmitry Kobak, Jonathan Lomond, and Benoit Sanchez, Implicit ridge regularization provided by the minimum-norm least squares estimator when n p, arXiv:1805.10939 (2018). · arXiv
- Jaehoon Lee, Yasaman Bahri, Roman Novak, Samuel S Schoenholz, Jeffrey Pennington, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Deep neural networks as gaussian processes, arXiv:1711.00165 (2017). · arXiv
- Yuanzhi Li and Yingyu Liang, Learning overparameterized neural networks via stochastic gra- dient descent on structured data, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, pp. 8157-8166.
- Cosme Louart, Zhenyu Liao, and Romain Couillet, A random matrix approach to neural net- works, The Annals of Applied Probability 28 (2018), no. 2, 1190-1248.
- Tengyuan Liang and Alexander Rakhlin, Just interpolate: Kernel" ridgeless" regression can generalize, arXiv:1808.00387 (2018). · arXiv
- Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, and Andrea Montanari, Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limit, arXiv:1902.06015 (2019). · arXiv
- Song Mei, Andrea Montanari, and Phan-Minh Nguyen, A mean field view of the landscape of two-layer neural networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (2018), no. 33, E7665-E7671.
- Domenico Marinucci and Giovanni Peccati, Random fields on the sphere: representation, limit theorems and cosmological applications, vol. 389, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
- Alexander G de G Matthews, Mark Rowland, Jiri Hron, Richard E Turner, and Zoubin Ghahra- mani, Gaussian process behaviour in wide deep neural networks, arXiv:1804.11271 (2018). · arXiv
- Andrea Montanari, Feng Ruan, Youngtak Sohn, and Jun Yan, The generalization error of max- margin linear classifiers: High-dimensional asymptotics in the overparametrized regime, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01544 (2019). · arXiv
- Vidya Muthukumar, Kailas Vodrahalli, and Anant Sahai, Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regression, arXiv:1903.09139 (2019). · arXiv
- Radford M Neal, Priors for infinite networks, Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks, Springer, 1996, pp. 29-53.
- Phan-Minh Nguyen, Mean field limit of the learning dynamics of multilayer neural networks, arXiv:1902.02880 (2019). · arXiv
- Samet Oymak and Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Towards moderate overparameterization: global con- vergence guarantees for training shallow neural networks, arXiv:1902.04674 (2019). · arXiv
- Jeffrey Pennington and Pratik Worah, Nonlinear random matrix theory for deep learning, Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 2637-2646.
- Grant Rotskoff, Samy Jelassi, Joan Bruna, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Neuron birth-death dy- namics accelerates gradient descent and converges asymptotically, International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019, pp. 5508-5517.
- Ali Rahimi and Benjamin Recht, Random features for large-scale kernel machines, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2008, pp. 1177-1184.
- Alessandro Rudi and Lorenzo Rosasco, Generalization properties of learning with random fea- tures, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 3215-3225.
- Grant M Rotskoff and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Neural networks as interacting particle systems: Asymptotic convexity of the loss landscape and universal scaling of the approximation error, arXiv:1805.00915 (2018). · arXiv
- Alexander Rakhlin and Xiyu Zhai, Consistency of interpolation with laplace kernels is a high- dimensional phenomenon, arXiv:1812.11167 (2018). · arXiv
- Szegő, Gabor, Orthogonal polynomials, vol. 23, American Mathematical Soc., 1939.
- Santosh Vempala and John Wilmes, Gradient descent for one-hidden-layer neural networks: Polynomial convergence and sq lower bounds, arXiv:1805.02677 (2018). · arXiv
- Christopher KI Williams, Computing with infinite networks, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1997, pp. 295-301.
- Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Moritz Hardt, Benjamin Recht, and Oriol Vinyals, Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization, arXiv:1611.03530 (2016). · arXiv
- Difan Zou, Yuan Cao, Dongruo Zhou, and Quanquan Gu, Stochastic gradient descent optimizes over-parameterized deep relu networks, Machine Learning 109 (2020), 467-492.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt*
Nakkiran, P., Kaplun, G., Bansal, Y., Yang, T., Barak, B., & Sutskever, I. (2021) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac3a74 · Cited by 565
Explaining Neural Scaling Laws
Bahri, Y., Dyer, E., Kaplan, J., Lee, J., & Sharma, U. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06701 · Cited by 182
Chang, X., Li, Y., Oymak, S., & Thrampoulidis, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16859 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Mei, S., & Montanari, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mei, Song
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 667-766
- ISSN
- 0010-3640 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1908.05355
- OpenAlex
- W3172995164
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 17
- FWCI
- 21.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (ONR N00014-18-1-2729, 1714305, 1741162)
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-18, ONR-N00014, ONR N00014-18-1-2729, N00014, N00014-18-1-2729)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- double descent, ridge regression, generalization error, overparameterization, two-layer neural networks, random feature maps, signal-to-noise ratio, exact asymptotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review