CubeSat Communications: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Given the increasing number of space-related applications, research in the emerging space industry is becoming more and more attractive. One compelling area of current space research is the design of miniaturized satellites, known as CubeSats, which are enticing because of their numerous applications and low design-and-deployment cost. The new paradigm of connected space through CubeSats makes possible a wide range of applications, such as Earth remote sensing, space exploration, and rural connectivity. CubeSats further provide a complementary connectivity solution to the pervasive Internet of Things (IoT) networks, leading to a globally connected cyber-physical system. This paper presents a holistic overview of various aspects of CubeSat missions and provides a thorough review of the topic from both academic and industrial perspectives. We further present recent advances in the area of CubeSat communications, with an emphasis on constellation-and-coverage issues, channel modeling, modulation and coding, and networking. Finally, we identify several future research directions for CubeSat communications, including Internet of space things, low-power long-range networks, and machine learning for CubeSat resource allocation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The new system, called the Resilient Networking and Computing Paradigm (RNCP), relies on blockchain and represents NASA's first step toward blockchain adoption in space applications.
“The new system, called the Resilient Networking and Computing Paradigm (RNCP), relies on blockchain and represents NASA's first step toward blockchain adoption in space applications [265, 266].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [265]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saeed, N., Elzanaty, A., Almorad, H., Dahrouj, H., Al-Naffouri, T. Y., & Alouini, M.-S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1839-1862
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1908.09501
- OpenAlex
- W3022612213
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 17
- FWCI
- 30.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
- Effat University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
- Keywords
- small satellites, satellite constellations, coverage analysis, channel modeling, modulation and coding, satellite networks, machine learning for resource allocation, rural connectivity, Earth observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review