The DOI matches its DataCite record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference
Abstract
Membership inference determines, given a sample and trained parameters of a machine learning model, whether the sample was part of the training set. In this paper, we derive the optimal strategy for membership inference with a few assumptions on the distribution of the parameters. We show that optimal attacks only depend on the loss function, and thus black-box attacks are as good as white-box attacks. As the optimal strategy is not tractable, we provide approximations of it leading to several inference methods, and show that existing membership inference methods are coarser approximations of this optimal strategy. Our membership attacks outperform the state of the art in various settings, ranging from a simple logistic regression to more complex architectures and datasets, such as ResNet-101 and Imagenet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it has been shown that the models themselves can, under certain conditions, memorise information40–43.”
From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11681878_14 · Cited by 7,272
Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838
Acceleration of Stochastic Approximation by Averaging
Polyak, B. T., & Juditsky, A. B. (1992) · SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · doi:10.1137/0330046 · Cited by 1,827
Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions
Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04730 · Cited by 1,514
The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networks
Carlini, N., Liu, C., Erlingsson, Ú., Kos, J., & Song, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08232 · Cited by 629
Cited by
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 4,015
GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Models
Chen, D., Yu, N., Zhang, Y., & Fritz, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3372297.3417238 · Cited by 311
A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learning
Rigaki, M., & Garcia, S. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3624010 · Cited by 285
Information Leakage in Embedding Models
Song, C., & Raghunathan, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3372297.3417270 · Cited by 175
How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy
Ponomareva, N., Hazimeh, H., Kurakin, A., Xu, Z., Denison, C., McMahan, H. B., Vassilvitskii, S., Chien, S., & Thakurta, A. G. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14649 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Sablayrolles, A., Douze, M., Ollivier, Y., Schmid, C., & Jégou, H.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- arXiv
- 1908.11229
- References
- 7
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1908.11229
- The paper
- Sablayrolles, A., Douze, M., Ollivier, Y., Schmid, C., & Jégou, H. (2019). White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1908.11229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
