The Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset: A Radar Extension to the Oxford RobotCar Dataset
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we present The Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset, a new dataset for researching scene understanding using Millimetre-Wave FMCW scanning radar data. The target application is autonomous vehicles where this modality is robust to environmental conditions such as fog, rain, snow, or lens flare, which typically challenge other sensor modalities such as vision and LIDAR. The data were gathered in January 2019 over thirty-two traversals of a central Oxford route spanning a total of 280km of urban driving. It encompasses a variety of weather, traffic, and lighting conditions. This 4.7TB dataset consists of over 240,000 scans from a Navtech CTS350-X radar and 2.4 million scans from two Velodyne HDL-32E 3D LIDARs; along with six cameras, two 2D LIDARs, and a GPS/INS receiver. In addition we release ground truth optimised radar odometry to provide an additional impetus to research in this domain. The full dataset is available for download at: ori.ox.ac.uk/datasets/radar-robotcar-dataset
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a few reviewed datasets provide Radar data: nuScenes, Oxford Radar RobotCar, and Astyx HiRes2019.
“Only the very recently nuScenes [89], Oxford Radar RobotCar [85] and Astyx HiRes2019 Datasets [94] provide Radar data.”
From Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feng, D., Haase-Schutz, C., Rosenbaum, L., Hertlein, H., Glaser, C., Timm, F., Wiesbeck, W., & Dietmayer, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2972974 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barnes, D., Gadd, M., Murcutt, P., Newman, P., & Posner, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 6433-6438
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.01300
- OpenAlex
- W3090139470
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 54.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M019918/1)
- Innovate UK
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
- Keywords
- radar dataset, millimeter-wave radar, autonomous vehicles, scene understanding, radar odometry, multi-sensor fusion, LiDAR, weather robustness, urban driving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
