The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lifelong Machine Learning with Deep Streaming Linear Discriminant Analysis
Open accessAbstract
When an agent acquires new information, ideally it would immediately be capable of using that information to understand its environment. This is not possible using conventional deep neural networks, which suffer from catastrophic forgetting when they are incrementally updated, with new knowledge overwriting established representations. A variety of approaches have been developed that attempt to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in the incremental batch learning scenario, where a model learns from a series of large collections of labeled samples. However, in this setting, inference is only possible after a batch has been accumulated, which prohibits many applications. An alternative paradigm is online learning in a single pass through the training dataset on a resource constrained budget, which is known as streaming learning. Streaming learning has been much less studied in the deep learning community. In streaming learning, an agent learns instances one-by-one and can be tested at any time, rather than only after learning a large batch. Here, we revisit streaming linear discriminant analysis, which has been widely used in the data mining research community. By combining streaming linear discriminant analysis with deep learning, we are able to outperform both incremental batch learning and streaming learning algorithms on both ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 and CORe50, a dataset that involves learning to classify from temporally ordered samples.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Class IL algorithms provide the most interesting results in recent works from literature.
“We focus on class IL algorithms which provide the most interesting results in recent works from literature [7, 8, 14, 23, 24, 28, 56, 75].”
From A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Fixed-representation based IL algorithms do not update the model but are less dependent on memory than fine-tuning based algorithms.
“We also present results with fixedrepresentation based algorithms [6, 23, 24, 56], which do not update the model but are also less dependent on memory.”
From A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Deep-SLDA does not need to store past class data and is thus functional in absence of memory.
“Deep -SLDA does not need to store past class data and it is thus functional in absence of memory.”
From A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Online learning methods are useful when the stream of data arrives image per image.
“Online learning methods [23, 24] are useful when the stream of data arrives image per image.”
From A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks
Belouadah, E., Popescu, A., & Kanellos, I. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01844 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, T. L., & Kanan, C.
- Affiliations
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 887-896
- arXiv
- 1909.01520
- OpenAlex
- W3046803548
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1909696)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-18-2-0263)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-18-1-0121)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Keywords
- catastrophic forgetting, lifelong machine learning, online learning, incremental learning, temporal classification, image classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review