PreprintCited by 150Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningData Stream Mining TechniquesMachine Learning and ELM

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lifelong Machine Learning with Deep Streaming Linear Discriminant Analysis

Open access

Abstract

When an agent acquires new information, ideally it would immediately be capable of using that information to understand its environment. This is not possible using conventional deep neural networks, which suffer from catastrophic forgetting when they are incrementally updated, with new knowledge overwriting established representations. A variety of approaches have been developed that attempt to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in the incremental batch learning scenario, where a model learns from a series of large collections of labeled samples. However, in this setting, inference is only possible after a batch has been accumulated, which prohibits many applications. An alternative paradigm is online learning in a single pass through the training dataset on a resource constrained budget, which is known as streaming learning. Streaming learning has been much less studied in the deep learning community. In streaming learning, an agent learns instances one-by-one and can be tested at any time, rather than only after learning a large batch. Here, we revisit streaming linear discriminant analysis, which has been widely used in the data mining research community. By combining streaming linear discriminant analysis with deep learning, we are able to outperform both incremental batch learning and streaming learning algorithms on both ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 and CORe50, a dataset that involves learning to classify from temporally ordered samples.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1909.01520

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, T. L., & Kanan, C.
Affiliations
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Pages
887-896
OpenAlex
W3046803548
Cited by
150
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10
FWCI
7.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1909696)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-18-2-0263)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-18-1-0121)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
Keywords
catastrophic forgetting, lifelong machine learning, online learning, incremental learning, temporal classification, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review