Pretrained AI Models: Performativity, Mobility, and Change
Open accessAbstract
The paradigm of pretrained deep learning models has recently emerged in artificial intelligence practice, allowing deployment in numerous societal settings with limited computational resources, but also embedding biases and enabling unintended negative uses. In this paper, we treat pretrained models as objects of study and discuss the ethical impacts of their sociological position. We discuss how pretrained models are developed and compared under the common task framework, but that this may make self-regulation inadequate. Further how pretrained models may have a performative effect on society that exacerbates biases. We then discuss how pretrained models move through actor networks as a kind of computationally immutable mobile, but that users also act as agents of technological change by reinterpreting them via fine-tuning and transfer. We further discuss how users may use pretrained models in malicious ways, drawing a novel connection between the responsible innovation and user-centered innovation literatures. We close by discussing how this sociological understanding of pretrained models can inform AI governance frameworks for fairness, accountability, and transparency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors' actions reflect principles from a recent sociology-based AI governance framework that aims to expand responsible innovation to consider networks of users, dynamics, and feedback.
“Our actions reflect principles from a recent sociology-based AI governance framework that aims to expand responsible innovation to consider networks of users, dynamics, and feedback (Varshney et al., 2019).”
From CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation (2019) · cites this paper as Varshney et al., 2019
Cites
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983 · see citing works
SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spans
Joshi, M., Chen, D., Liu, Y., Weld, D. S., Zettlemoyer, L., & Levy, O. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00300 · Cited by 1,827 · see citing works
The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.07228 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Ordonez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1323 · Cited by 829 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[97] Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-”
BackgroundInfluentialOn Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders
May, C., Wang, A., Bordia, S., Bowman, S. R., & Rudinger, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1063 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity
Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K. E., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K. N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942288 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Moral crumple zones: cautionary tales in human–robot interaction
Elish, M. C. (2019) · Engaging Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2019.260 · Cited by 321 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An alternative is an ethics of co-responsibility, where producers and lead users assume shared responsibility [27] for intended and unintended consequences, rather than producers being cast as a kind of moral crumple zone [25].”
BackgroundFloridi, L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0112 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Marcus, G., Rossi, F., & Veloso, M. (2016) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v37i1.2650 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation
Keskar, N. S., McCann, B., Varshney, L. R., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.05858 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Self-citationBERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language Models
Vig, J., Madani, A., Varshney, L. R., Xiong, C., Socher, R., & Rajani, N. F. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.26.174417 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Varshney, L. R., Keskar, N. S., & Socher, R.
- Affiliations
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.03290
- OpenAlex
- W2971671202
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Keywords
- pre-trained deep learning models, AI ethics, algorithmic bias, performative effects, actor-network theory, mobile code, fine-tuning, knowledge transfer, malicious use of AI, responsible innovation, user-centered innovation, AI governance, fairness, accountability, and transparency, self-regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
