PreprintCited by 236Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Implementing Grover oracles for quantum key search on AES and LowMC

Open access

Abstract

Grover's search algorithm gives a quantum attack against block ciphers by searching for a key that matches a small number of plaintext-ciphertext pairs. This attack uses $O(\sqrt{N})$ calls to the cipher to search a key space of size $N$. Previous work in the specific case of AES derived the full gate cost by analyzing quantum circuits for the cipher, but focused on minimizing the number of qubits. In contrast, we study the cost of quantum key search attacks under a depth restriction and introduce techniques that reduce the oracle depth, even if it requires more qubits. As cases in point, we design quantum circuits for the block ciphers AES and LowMC. Our circuits give a lower overall attack cost in both the gate count and depth-times-width cost models. In NIST's post-quantum cryptography standardization process, security categories are defined based on the concrete cost of quantum key search against AES. We present new, lower cost estimates for each category, so our work has immediate implications for the security assessment of post-quantum cryptography. As part of this work, we release Q# implementations of the full Grover oracle for AES-128, -192, -256 and for the three LowMC instantiations used in Picnic, including unit tests and code to reproduce our quantum resource estimates. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first two such full implementations and automatic resource estimations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.01700

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 236

Metadata

Authors
Jaques, S., Naehrig, M., Roetteler, M., & Virdia, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Jaques, Samuel
  • Naehrig, Michael
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Pages
280-310
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979004593
Cited by
236
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • University of Oxford
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P009301/1)
  • Royal Holloway, University of London (EP/P009301/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
Grover's algorithm, AES, block cipher, quantum circuit design, circuit depth, gate count, post-quantum cryptography, picnics, quantum resource estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review