PreprintCited by 226Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size

Open access
Farhi, Edward, Goldstone, Jeffrey, Gutmann, Sam, Zhou, Leo·2019·arXiv

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a general-purpose algorithm for combinatorial optimization problems whose performance can only improve with the number of layers $p$. While QAOA holds promise as an algorithm that can be run on near-term quantum computers, its computational power has not been fully explored. In this work, we study the QAOA applied to the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model, which can be understood as energy minimization of $n$ spins with all-to-all random signed couplings. There is a recent classical algorithm by Montanari that, assuming a widely believed conjecture, can efficiently find an approximate solution for a typical instance of the SK model to within $(1-ε)$ times the ground state energy. We hope to match its performance with the QAOA. Our main result is a novel technique that allows us to evaluate the typical-instance energy of the QAOA applied to the SK model. We produce a formula for the expected value of the energy, as a function of the $2p$ QAOA parameters, in the infinite size limit that can be evaluated on a computer with $O(16^p)$ complexity. We evaluate the formula up to $p=12$, and find that the QAOA at $p=11$ outperforms the standard semidefinite programming algorithm. Moreover, we show concentration: With probability tending to one as $n\to\infty$, measurements of the QAOA will produce strings whose energies concentrate at our calculated value. As an algorithm running on a quantum computer, there is no need to search for optimal parameters on an instance-by-instance basis since we can determine them in advance. What we have here is a new framework for analyzing the QAOA, and our techniques can be of broad interest for evaluating its performance on more general problems where classical algorithms may fail.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.08187

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar concentration behavior was reported for the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model in the infinite size limit.

    “Similar concentration behavior was also reported for the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model in the infinite size limit (Farhi et al. , 2019).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Farhi et al. , 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. A. Montanari. "Optimization of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian". In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS '19). Pages 1417-1433. (2019). · DOI
  2. Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. "A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algo- rithm" (2014). arXiv:1411.4028. · arXiv
  3. Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. "A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algo- rithm Applied to a Bounded Occurrence Constraint Problem" (2015). arXiv:1412.6062. · arXiv
  4. Cedric Yen-Yu Lin and Yechao Zhu. "Performance of QAOA on Typical Instances of Constraint Satis- faction Problems with Bounded Degree" (2016). arXiv:1601.01744. · arXiv
  5. Fernando G. S. L. Brandao, Michael Broughton, Edward Farhi, Sam Gutmann, and Hartmut Neven. "For Fixed Control Parameters the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm's Objective Function Value Concentrates for Typical Instances" (2018). arXiv:1812.04170. · arXiv
  6. G. Parisi. "Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses". Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754-1756 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dmitry Panchenko. "The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model". Springer. New York (2013). · DOI
  8. A. Crisanti and T. Rizzo. "Analysis of the ∞-replica symmetry breaking solution of the Sherrington- Kirkpatrick model". Phys. Rev. E 65, 046137 (2002). · DOI
  9. Manuel J. Schmidt. "Replica Symmetry Breaking at Low Temperatures". PhD thesis. Julius- Maximilians-Universität Würzburg. (2008).
  10. Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D. Lukin. "Quantum Approx- imate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices". Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gavin E. Crooks. "Performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on the Maximum Cut Problem" (2018). arXiv:1811.08419. · arXiv
  12. Michael Aizenman, Joel Lebowitz, and D. Ruelle. "Some rigorous results on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model". Commun. Math. Phys. 112, 3-20 (1987). · DOI
  13. Andrea Montanari and Subhabrata Sen. "Semidefinite programs on sparse random graphs and their application to community detection". In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '16). Pages 814-827. (2016). arXiv:1504.05910. · DOI
  14. Afonso S. Bandeira, Dmitriy Kunisky, and Alexander S. Wein. "Computational Hardness of Certi- fying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problems". In 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020). Volume 151, pages 78:1-78:29. Dagstuhl, Germany (2020). Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. arXiv:1902.07324. · DOI
  15. Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. "Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes". Nature Communications 9, 4812 (2018). arXiv:1803.11173. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Joao Basso, Edward Farhi, Kunal Marwaha, Benjamin Villalonga, and Leo Zhou. "The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm at High Depth for MaxCut on Large-Girth Regular Graphs and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model" (2022). arXiv:2110.14206. · arXiv
  17. Wei Kuo Chen, David Gamarnik, Dmitry Panchenko, and Mustazee Rahman. "Suboptimality of local algorithms for a class of max-cut problems". Annals of Probability 47, 1587-1618 (2019). arXiv:1707.05386. · DOI
  18. David Gamarnik and Aukosh Jagannath. "The overlap gap property and approximate message passing algorithms for p-spin models". Annals of Probability 49, 180-205 (2021). arXiv:1911.06943. · DOI
  19. Ahmed El Alaoui and Andrea Montanari. "Algorithmic Thresholds in Mean Field Spin Glasses" (2020). arXiv:2009.11481. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., & Zhou, L.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
6
Pages
759-759
ISSN
2521-327X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980961571
Cited by
226
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-17-1-0433, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, combinatorial optimization, energy concentration, semidefinite programming, Monte Carlo sampling, variational quantum algorithms, ground state energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review