The DOI matches its DataCite record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
From an environmental standpoint, there are a few crucial aspects of training a neural network that have a major impact on the quantity of carbon that it emits. These factors include: the location of the server used for training and the energy grid that it uses, the length of the training procedure, and even the make and model of hardware on which the training takes place. In order to approximate these emissions, we present our Machine Learning Emissions Calculator, a tool for our community to better understand the environmental impact of training ML models. We accompany this tool with an explanation of the factors cited above, as well as concrete actions that individual practitioners and organizations can take to mitigate their carbon emissions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the 'Machine Learning Emissions Calculator' for estimating the carbon footprint of GPU compute through specifying hardware type, hours used, cloud provider, and region [12], Anthony et al. [3]”
From Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“In Section 5, we discuss how while the estimation methods of these works provide some understanding of carbon and energy impacts, nuances in the estimation methods may make them inaccurate-particularly in experiments which utilize combined CPU and GPU workloads heavily.”
From Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Lacoste et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Some GPUs have substantially higher efficiency in terms of floating point operations per second (FLOPS) per watt of power usage compared to others (Lacoste et al., 2019).”
From Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Models (2020) · cites this paper as Lacoste et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Estimations were conducted using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in [66].”
From SatMAE: Pre-Training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagery (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“For a model pre-trained and finetuned on fMoW Sentinel dataset, total emissions are estimated to be 109.44 kg CO 2 eq.”
From SatMAE: Pre-Training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagery (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“Total emissions are estimated to be 136.8 kg CO 2 eq. of which 100 percent was directly offset by the cloud provider.”
From SatMAE: Pre-Training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagery (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 1×
“For a model such as VGG [18] or BERT [19], which are trained on multiple GPUs for several weeks, this can correspond to avoiding emitting several hundreds of kilograms of CO 2 eq by training on a server powered by hydroelectricity instead of fossil fuels.”
MethodBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 1×
“For a model such as VGG [18] or BERT [19], which are trained on multiple GPUs for several weeks, this can correspond to avoiding emitting several hundreds of kilograms of CO 2 eq by training on a server powered by hydroelectricity instead of fossil fuels.”
Method(2012) · Cited by 8,009
Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100 · cited 1×
“Notably, recent research has shown that using pre-trained models with task-specific fine-tuning performs as well as training from scratch, while being more robust, for tasks in image recognition [7, 8] and NLP [9].”
BackgroundEnergy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684 · cited 2×
“This trend has been the subject of recent studies aiming to evaluate the climate impact of AI, which have predominantly put the focus on the environmental cost of training large-scale models connected to grids powered by fossil fuels [1, 2].”
BackgroundConvolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?
Tajbakhsh, N., Shin, J. Y., Gurudu, S. R., Hurst, R. T., Kendall, C. B., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2535302 · Cited by 3,277 · cited 1×
“Notably, recent research has shown that using pre-trained models with task-specific fine-tuning performs as well as training from scratch, while being more robust, for tasks in image recognition [7, 8] and NLP [9].”
BackgroundHyperband: a novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization
Li, L., Jamieson, K., DeSalvo, G., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2017) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 930
Fine-tuned Language Models for Text Classification.Preprint
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 357
Food image recognition using deep convolutional network with pre-training and fine-tuning
Yanai, ., & Kawano, Y. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW) · doi:10.1109/icmew.2015.7169816 · Cited by 339 · cited 1×
“Notably, recent research has shown that using pre-trained models with task-specific fine-tuning performs as well as training from scratch, while being more robust, for tasks in image recognition [7, 8] and NLP [9].”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–414 of 414
Advancing Oil and Gas Facility Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning and Vision LLMs
Verma, P., Zou, S., & Gandhi, K. (2025) · International Conference on Electronics Representation and Algorithm (ICERA) · doi:10.1109/icera66156.2025.11087342
“The findings contribute to the development of scalable and accurate solutions for emission tracking, with potential benefits for academia, industry, and policy, particularly in enabling real-time infrastructure surveillance and improving global methane emission reporting [20].”
Graph neural networks with configuration cross-attention for tensor compilers
Khizbullin, D., de Andrade, E. R., Nguyen, T. H., Ferreira, M. P., & Pugh, D. R. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1605539
“Training one set of models for all collections produces 13.45 kg CO 2 as per Lacoste et al. (2019).”
InfluentialOvercoming distortion in multidimensional predictive representationPreprint
Prentis, E., & Bakkour, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108664.1
Overcoming distortion in multidimensional predictive representationPreprint
Prentis, E., & Bakkour, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108664
Modelcards für die Bewertung der Umweltauswirkungen von KI-Systemen
Kirnberger, J. L. (2025) · SDG - Forschung, Konzepte, Lösungsansätze zur Nachhaltigkeit · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-46577-3_18
Segmentation of metabolically relevant adipose tissue compartments and ectopic fat depositsPreprint
Haueise, T., & Machann, J. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.25.26347069
Khatik, S. K., Joshi, R., Shrivastava, G., & Dey, S. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80592-212-420261017
A Societally-Aware Benchmarking Framework for Deep Learning Models
Ho, A. K. N., Hassine, I. B., & Schaack, S. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3783862.3783868
“For instance, [20] 13 assessed CO₂ emissions during model training by factoring in server location, energy grid characteristics, training duration, and hardware specifications.”
Mapping Imaginaries: A Futures Workshop for Creative Practices with Generative AI
Bagchi, P., Moruzzi, C., Bird, C., Chan, K. H., Dixon, B., Herman, L. M., Morrison, K., Wiradarmo, A. A., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3812784
“In line with emerging work on the environmental footprint of AI [e.g., 5, 20, 25, 22, 35, 36], participants questioned whether the energy and material demand of GAI models can be reconciled with climate commitments.”
Corso, L., Fantinato, A., Kayar, E., Isernia, M., Fiorentino, G., Taggi, M., Innocenti, F., Meseguer, M., Vaiarelli, A., Rienzi, L. F., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30710-1_23
Saba, F., Ahmadian, N., & Dubovyk, O. (2026) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2026.2738981
Kumar, M., Patouillard, L., Donaldson, A., Cornago, S., Bartocci, P., Tu, Q., Wachter, H. D., Hübner, N., Dumont, M., Coroamă, V. C., et al. (2026) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9984806/v1
Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities
Wu, C.-J., Raghavendra, R., Gupta, U., Acun, B., Ardalani, N., Maeng, K., Chang, G., Behram, F. A., Huang, J., Bai, C., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.00364 · Cited by 405
“Despite the recent calls-to-action [27], [37], [38], [39], [21], the overall community remains under-invested in research that aims at deeply understanding and minimizing the cost of AI.”
BackgroundMetrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation
Maier-Hein, L., Reinke, A., Godau, P., Tizabi, M. D., Buettner, F., Christodoulou, E., Glocker, B., Isensee, F., Kleesiek, J., Kozubek, M., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.01653 · Cited by 59
“R.M.S. was an active member of the ObD and InS, the biomedical and the cross-topic expert groups, reviewed the manuscript, and participated in surveys and workshops.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacoste, A., Luccioni, A., Schmidt, V., & Dandres, T.
- Affiliations
- Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.09700
- OpenAlex
- W2981540061
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 16
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- CO2 emissions, machine learning training, environmental impact of AI, neural network training, power grid, training duration, carbon mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
