PreprintCited by 21Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reinforcement-Learning-Based Variational Quantum Circuits Optimization for Combinatorial Problems

Open access

Abstract

Quantum computing exploits basic quantum phenomena such as state superposition and entanglement to perform computations. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is arguably one of the leading quantum algorithms that can outperform classical state-of-the-art methods in the near term. QAOA is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that combines a parameterized quantum state evolution with a classical optimization routine to approximately solve combinatorial problems. The quality of the solution obtained by QAOA within a fixed budget of calls to the quantum computer depends on the performance of the classical optimization routine used to optimize the variational parameters. In this work, we propose an approach based on reinforcement learning (RL) to train a policy network that can be used to quickly find high-quality variational parameters for unseen combinatorial problem instances. The RL agent is trained on small problem instances which can be simulated on a classical computer, yet the learned RL policy is generalizable and can be used to efficiently solve larger instances. Extensive simulations using the IBM Qiskit Aer quantum circuit simulator demonstrate that our trained RL policy can reduce the optimality gap by a factor up to 8.61 compared with other off-the-shelf optimizers tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1911.04574

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods to conduct classical parameter optimization of a VQA beyond standard classical optimizers comprise machine learning approaches and sequential minimal optimization.

    “Methods to conduct the classical parameter optimization of a VQA that go beyond the standard classical optimizers (cf. [166]) comprise machine learning approaches [51, 75, 76, 141, 143, 146] and sequential minimal optimization [99].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1][1] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv:1411.4028 , 2014. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] Michael Streif and Martin Leib. Comparison of QAOA with quantum and simulated annealing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01903 , 2019. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] Ruslan Shaydulin, Hayato Ushijima-Mwesigwa, Ilya Safro, Susan Mniszewski, and Yuri Alexeev. Community detection across emerging quantum architectures. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Post Moore's Era Supercomputing , 2018. -
  4. [5][5] Panagiotis Kl Barkoutsos, Giacomo Nannicini, Anton Robert, Ivano Tavernelli, and Stefan Woerner. Improving variational quantum optimization using CVaR. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04769 , 2019. - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D Lukin. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: Performance, mechanism, and implementation on nearterm devices. arXiv:1812.01041 , 2018. - · arXiv
  6. [11][11] Ruslan Shaydulin, Ilya Safro, and Jeffrey Larson. Multistart methods for quantum approximate opxtimization. 2019 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) , 2019. -
  7. [13][13] Dave Wecker, Matthew B Hastings, and Matthias Troyer. Training a quantum optimizer. Physical Review A , 94(2):022309, 2016. -
  8. [14][14] Zhi-Cheng Yang, Armin Rahmani, Alireza Shabani, Hartmut Neven, and Claudio Chamon. Optimizing variational quantum algorithms using Pontryagin's minimum principle. Physical Review X , 7(2):021027, 2017. -
  9. [15][15] Guillaume Verdon, Michael Broughton, Jarrod R McClean, Kevin J Sung, Ryan Babbush, Zhang Jiang, Hartmut Neven, and Masoud Mohseni. Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05415 , 2019. - · arXiv
  10. [16][16] Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez, Matthew W Hoffman, David Pfau, Tom Schaul, Brendan Shillingford, and Nando De Freitas. Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent. In Advances in neural Information Processing Systems , pages 3981-3989, 2016. -
  11. [17][17] Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. Learning to optimize. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01885 , 2016. - · arXiv
  12. [18][18] Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction . MIT Press, 2018. -
  13. [21][21] John A Nelder and Roger Mead. A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal , 7(4):308-313, 1965. The submitted manuscript has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory ('Argonne'). Argonne, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The U.S. Government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan. http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khairy, S., Shaydulin, R., Cincio, L., Alexeev, Y., & Balaprakash, P.
Affiliations
Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984991932
Cited by
21
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, AC02‐06CH11357, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
  • Office of Science (AC02‐06CH11357, DE-AC02, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Advanced Scientific Computing Research (AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (DE-AC02, AC02–06CH11357, 06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, reinforcement learning, variational quantum circuits, combinatorial optimization, policy networks, variational parameter optimization, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, optimality gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review