The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies model-inversion attacks, in which the access to a model is abused to infer information about the training data. Since its first introduction, such attacks have raised serious concerns given that training data usually contain privacy-sensitive information. Thus far, successful model-inversion attacks have only been demonstrated on simple models, such as linear regression and logistic regression. Previous attempts to invert neural networks, even the ones with simple architectures, have failed to produce convincing results. We present a novel attack method, termed the generative model-inversion attack, which can invert deep neural networks with high success rates. Rather than reconstructing private training data from scratch, we leverage partial public information, which can be very generic, to learn a distributional prior via generative adversarial networks (GANs) and use it to guide the inversion process. Moreover, we theoretically prove that a model's predictive power and its vulnerability to inversion attacks are indeed two sides of the same coin---highly predictive models are able to establish a strong correlation between features and labels, which coincides exactly with what an adversary exploits to mount the attacks. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed attack improves identification accuracy over the existing work by about 75\% for reconstructing face images from a state-of-the-art face recognition classifier. We also show that differential privacy, in its canonical form, is of little avail to defend against our attacks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible to reconstruct parts of the training data from the algorithm weights themselves on a decentralized node.
“It is therefore possible to reconstruct parts of the training data from the algorithm weights themselves on a decentralized node [52][53][54] .”
From Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging
Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Jia, R., Pei, H., Wang, W., Li, B., & Song, D.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 250-258
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1911.07135
- OpenAlex
- W3035616549
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 15 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1910100)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- model inversion attacks, deep neural network, privacy leakage, training data reconstruction, generative adversarial networks, face recognition, face image reconstruction, differential privacy, adversarial attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review