PreprintCited by 465Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic Detection

The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks

Open access
Zhang, Yuheng, Jia, Ruoxi, Pei, Hengzhi, Wang, Wenxiao, Li, Bo, Song, Dawn·2019·arXiv

Abstract

This paper studies model-inversion attacks, in which the access to a model is abused to infer information about the training data. Since its first introduction, such attacks have raised serious concerns given that training data usually contain privacy-sensitive information. Thus far, successful model-inversion attacks have only been demonstrated on simple models, such as linear regression and logistic regression. Previous attempts to invert neural networks, even the ones with simple architectures, have failed to produce convincing results. We present a novel attack method, termed the generative model-inversion attack, which can invert deep neural networks with high success rates. Rather than reconstructing private training data from scratch, we leverage partial public information, which can be very generic, to learn a distributional prior via generative adversarial networks (GANs) and use it to guide the inversion process. Moreover, we theoretically prove that a model's predictive power and its vulnerability to inversion attacks are indeed two sides of the same coin---highly predictive models are able to establish a strong correlation between features and labels, which coincides exactly with what an adversary exploits to mount the attacks. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed attack improves identification accuracy over the existing work by about 75\% for reconstructing face images from a state-of-the-art face recognition classifier. We also show that differential privacy, in its canonical form, is of little avail to defend against our attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1911.07135

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible to reconstruct parts of the training data from the algorithm weights themselves on a decentralized node.

    “It is therefore possible to reconstruct parts of the training data from the algorithm weights themselves on a decentralized node [52][53][54] .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Jia, R., Pei, H., Wang, W., Li, B., & Song, D.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Pages
250-258
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035616549
Cited by
465
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1910100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
model inversion attacks, deep neural network, privacy leakage, training data reconstruction, generative adversarial networks, face recognition, face image reconstruction, differential privacy, adversarial attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review