The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
vqSGD: Vector Quantized Stochastic Gradient Descent
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we present a family of vector quantization schemes \emph{vqSGD} (Vector-Quantized Stochastic Gradient Descent) that provide an asymptotic reduction in the communication cost with convergence guarantees in first-order distributed optimization. In the process we derive the following fundamental information theoretic fact: $Θ(\frac{d}{R^2})$ bits are necessary and sufficient to describe an unbiased estimator ${\hat{g}}({g})$ for any ${g}$ in the $d$-dimensional unit sphere, under the constraint that $\|{\hat{g}}({g})\|_2\le R$ almost surely. In particular, we consider a randomized scheme based on the convex hull of a point set, that returns an unbiased estimator of a $d$-dimensional gradient vector with almost surely bounded norm. We provide multiple efficient instances of our scheme, that are near optimal, and require only $o(d)$ bits of communication at the expense of tolerable increase in error. The instances of our quantization scheme are obtained using the properties of binary error-correcting codes and provide a smooth tradeoff between the communication and the estimation error of quantization. Furthermore, we show that \emph{vqSGD} also offers strong privacy guarantees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“By designing the noise correctly, we may ensure that the noise in the aggregated result matches the noise that would have otherwise been added centrally by a trusted server (e.g. with a low ε / high privacy level) [8, 385, 205, 417, 213].”
From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [205]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 80
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- [1][1] Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , pages 308-318. ACM, 2016. -
- [2][2] Jayadev Acharya, Chris De Sa, Dylan Foster, and Karthik Sridharan. Distributed learning with sublinear communication. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 40-50, 2019. -
- [3][3] Jayadev Acharya, Ziteng Sun, and Huanyu Zhang. Hadamard response: Estimating distributions privately, efficiently, and with little communication. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 1120-1129, 2019. -
- [4][4] Naman Agarwal, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Felix Xinnan X Yu, Sanjiv Kumar, and Brendan McMahan. cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGD. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 7564-7575, 2018. -
- [5][5] Dan Alistarh, Demjan Grubic, Jerry Li, Ryota Tomioka, and Milan Vojnovic. QSGD: Communication-efficient SGD via gradient quantization and encoding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 1709-1720, 2017. -
- [6][6] Dan Alistarh, Torsten Hoefler, Mikael Johansson, Nikola Konstantinov, Sarit Khirirat, and C´ edric Renggli. The convergence of sparsified gradient methods. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 5973-5983, 2018. -
- [7][7] Jeremy Bernstein, Yu-Xiang Wang, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, and Animashree Anandkumar. signSGD: Compressed optimization for non-convex problems. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 560-569, 2018. -
- [8][8] P Borjesson and C-E Sundberg. Simple approximations of the error function q(x) for communications applications. IEEE Transactions on Communications , 27(3):639-643, 1979. -
- [10][10] Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology (TIST) , 2(3):27, 2011. -
- [11][11] Trishul Chilimbi, Yutaka Suzue, Johnson Apacible, and Karthik Kalyanaraman. Project adam: Building an efficient and scalable deep learning training system. In 11th { USENIX } Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation ( { OSDI } 14) , pages 571-582, 2014. -
- [12][12] G´ erard Cohen, Iiro Honkala, Simon Litsyn, and Antoine Lobstein. Covering codes , volume 54. Elsevier, 1997. -
- [13][13] Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality , 7(3):17-51, 2016. -
- [14][14] Cynthia Dwork, Aaron Roth, et al. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends ® in Theoretical Computer Science , 9(3-4):211-407, 2014. -
- [15][15] Cynthia Dwork, Guy N Rothblum, and Salil Vadhan. Boosting and differential privacy. In 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science , pages 51-60. IEEE, 2010. -
- [16][16] ´ Ulfar Erlingsson, Vasyl Pihur, and Aleksandra Korolova. Rappor: Randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security , pages 1054-1067. ACM, 2014. -
- [17][17] Stelios Georgiou, Christos Koukouvinos, and Jennifer Seberry. Hadamard matrices, orthogonal designs and construction algorithms. In Designs 2002 , pages 133-205. Springer, 2003. -
- [18][18] Samuel Horv´ ath, Dmitry Kovalev, Konstantin Mishchenko, Sebastian Stich, and Peter Richt´ arik. Stochastic Distributed Learning with Gradient Quantization and Variance Reduction. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1904.05115, Apr 2019. - · arXiv
- [19][19] Nikita Ivkin, Daniel Rothchild, Enayat Ullah, Ion Stoica, Raman Arora, et al. Communicationefficient distributed SGD with sketching. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 13144-13154, 2019. -
- [20][20] Seyed Mohammadreza Mousavi Kalan, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, and A Salman Avestimehr. Fitting ReLus via SGD and quantized SGD. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) , pages 2469-2473. IEEE, 2019. -
- [21][21] Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Quentin Rebjock, Sebastian Stich, and Martin Jaggi. Error feedback fixes signSGD and other gradient compression schemes. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 3252-3261, 2019. -
- [22][22] Anastasiia Koloskova, Sebastian Urban Stich, and Martin Jaggi. Decentralized stochastic optimization and gossip algorithms with compressed communication. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , 97(CONF), 2019. -
- [23][23] Jakub Koneˇ cn` y, H Brendan McMahan, Felix X Yu, Peter Richt´ arik, Ananda Theertha Suresh, and Dave Bacon. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [26][26] Florence Jessie MacWilliams and Neil James Alexander Sloane. The theory of error-correcting codes , volume 16. Elsevier, 1977. -
- [27][27] Prathamesh Mayekar and Himanshu Tyagi. Ratq: A universal fixed-length quantizer for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08200 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [28][28] Frank Seide, Hao Fu, Jasha Droppo, Gang Li, and Dong Yu. 1-bit stochastic gradient descent and its application to data-parallel distributed training of speech dnns. In Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association , 2014. -
- [29][29] Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David. Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms . Cambridge university press, 2014. -
- [30][30] Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Nathan Srebro, and Tong Zhang. Trading accuracy for sparsity in optimization problems with sparsity constraints. SIAM Journal on Optimization , 20(6):28072832, 2010. -
- [31][31] Reza Shokri and Vitaly Shmatikov. Privacy-preserving deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security , pages 1310-1321. ACM, 2015. -
- [32][32] Sebastian U Stich, Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, and Martin Jaggi. Sparsified SGD with memory. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 4447-4458, 2018. -
- [33][33] Nikko Strom. Scalable distributed DNN training using commodity GPU cloud computing. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association , 2015. -
- [34][34] Ananda Theertha Suresh, Felix X Yu, Sanjiv Kumar, and H Brendan McMahan. Distributed mean estimation with limited communication. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 , pages 3329-3337. JMLR. org, 2017. -
- [35][35] Martin J Wainwright. High-dimensional statistics: A non-asymptotic viewpoint , volume 48. Cambridge University Press, 2019. -
- [36][36] Hongyi Wang, Scott Sievert, Shengchao Liu, Zachary Charles, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, and Stephen Wright. Atomo: Communication-efficient learning via atomic sparsification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 9850-9861, 2018. -
- [37][37] Stanley L Warner. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 60(309):63-69, 1965. -
- [38][38] Wei Wen, Cong Xu, Feng Yan, Chunpeng Wu, Yandan Wang, Yiran Chen, and Hai Li. Terngrad: Ternary gradients to reduce communication in distributed deep learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1509-1519, 2017. -
- [40][40] Yuchen Zhang, John Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. Information-theoretic lower bounds for distributed statistical estimation with communication constraints. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 2328-2336, 2013.
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandikota, V., Kane, D., Maity, R. K., & Mazumdar, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4573-4587
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1911.07971
- OpenAlex
- W2989787172
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1618512, 2127929, 1934846, 1909046, 1642658)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
- Keywords
- vector quantization, stochastic gradient descent, distributed optimization, communication cost reduction, unbiased gradient estimation, information-theoretic lower bounds, convex hull, binary error-correcting codes, privacy guarantees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: vqSGD: Vector Quantized Stochastic Gradient Descent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1911.07971
- The paper
- Gandikota, V., Kane, D., Maity, R. K., & Mazumdar, A. (2019). vqSGD: Vector Quantized Stochastic Gradient Descent. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1911.07971