The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Quantum Observables for continuous control of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm via Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
We present a classical control mechanism for Quantum devices using Reinforcement Learning. Our strategy is applied to the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in order to optimize an objective function that encodes a solution to a hard combinatorial problem. This method provides optimal control of the Quantum device following a reformulation of QAOA as an environment where an autonomous classical agent interacts and performs actions to achieve higher rewards. This formulation allows a hybrid classical-Quantum device to train itself from previous executions using a continuous formulation of deep Q-learning to control the continuous degrees of freedom of QAOA. Our approach makes a selective use of Quantum measurements to complete the observations of the Quantum state available to the agent. We run tests of this approach on MAXCUT instances of size up to N = 21 obtaining optimal results. We show how this formulation can be used to transfer the knowledge from shorter training episodes to reach a regime of longer executions where QAOA delivers higher results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Methods to conduct the classical parameter optimization of a VQA that go beyond the standard classical optimizers (cf. [166]) comprise machine learning approaches [51, 75, 76, 141, 143, 146] and sequential minimal optimization [99].”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study
Gemeinhardt, F., Garmendia, A., Wimmer, M., Weder, B., & Leymann, F. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3620668 · Cited by 22
“…[10], [78], [86] Ansatz [11, 36, 48, 58, 82, 86, 88, 89, 95–97], [112], [116], [117, 120, 127, 131, 151], [152, 153, 155] Parameter Optimization [51], [75], [76, 99], [141], [143], [146] Measurement [122], [125] Grover-search [52], [118] Other gate-based approaches [15], [16], [24], [94]…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia-Saez, A., & Riu, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1911.09682
- OpenAlex
- W2990404967
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum approximate optimization algorithm, reinforcement learning, deep Q-learning, continuous control, MaxCut, combinatorial optimization, quantum measurement, knowledge transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Observables for continuous control of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm via Reinforcement Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1911.09682
- The paper
- Garcia-Saez, A., & Riu, J. (2019). Quantum Observables for continuous control of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm via Reinforcement Learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1911.09682
