CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 3

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LOGAN: Latent Optimisation for Generative Adversarial Networks

Wu, Yan, Donahue, Jeff, Balduzzi, David, Simonyan, Karen, Lillicrap, Timothy·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1912.00953arXiv 1912.00953
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Training generative adversarial networks requires balancing of delicate adversarial dynamics. Even with careful tuning, training may diverge or end up in a bad equilibrium with dropped modes. In this work, we improve CS-GAN with natural gradient-based latent optimisation and show that it improves adversarial dynamics by enhancing interactions between the discriminator and the generator. Our experiments demonstrate that latent optimisation can significantly improve GAN training, obtaining state-of-the-art performance for the ImageNet ($128 \times 128$) dataset. Our model achieves an Inception Score (IS) of $148$ and an Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) of $3.4$, an improvement of $17\%$ and $32\%$ in IS and FID respectively, compared with the baseline BigGAN-deep model with the same architecture and number of parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.00953

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, et al. Tensorflow: A system for large- scale machine learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Imple- mentation OSDI, pp. 265-283, 2016.
  2. Shun-Ichi Amari. Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural computation, 10(2):251- 276, 1998.
  3. Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasserstein GAN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07875, 2017. · arXiv
  4. Sanjeev Arora, Rong Ge, Yingyu Liang, Tengyu Ma, and Yi Zhang. Generalization and equilibrium in generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, pp. 224-232. JMLR. org, 2017.
  5. David Balduzzi, Sebastien Racaniere, James Martens, Jakob Foerster, Karl Tuyls, and Thore Grae- pel. The mechanics of n-player differentiable games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05642, 2018. · arXiv
  6. Mohamed Ishmael Belghazi, Aristide Baratin, Sai Rajeswar, Sherjil Ozair, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and R Devon Hjelm. MINE: Mutual information neural estimation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018.
  7. Vivek S Borkar. Stochastic approximation with two time scales. Systems & Control Letters, 29(5): 291-294, 1997.
  8. Emmanuel J Candes, Justin K Romberg, and Terence Tao. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 59(8):1207-1223, 2006.
  9. Aidan Clark, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Efficient video generation on complex datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06571, 2019. · arXiv
  10. Zihang Dai, Amjad Almahairi, Philip Bachman, Eduard Hovy, and Aaron Courville. Calibrating energy-based generative adversarial networks. ICLR, 2017.
  11. Adji B. Dieng, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, David M. Blei, and Michalis K. Titsias. Prescribed generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04302, 2019. · arXiv
  12. Chris Donahue, Julian McAuley, and Miller Puckette. Adversarial audio synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04208, 2018. · arXiv
  13. Jeff Donahue and Karen Simonyan. Large scale adversarial representation learning. In NeurIPS, 2019.
  14. Jeff Donahue, Philipp Krähenbühl, and Trevor Darrell. Adversarial feature learning. In ICLR, 2017.
  15. David L Donoho. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on information theory, 52(4):1289- 1306, 2006.
  16. Yilun Du and Igor Mordatch. Implicit generation and generalization in energy-based models. Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  17. Vincent Dumoulin, Ishmael Belghazi, Ben Poole, Olivier Mastropietro, Alex Lamb, Martin Ar- jovsky, and Aaron Courville. Advesarially learned inference. In ICLR, 2017.
  18. Ian Gemp and Sridhar Mahadevan. Global Convergence to the Equilibrium of GANs using Varia- tional Inequalities. In Arxiv:1808.01531, 2018. · arXiv
  19. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, pp. 2672-2680, 2014.
  20. Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6626-6637, 2017.
  21. Morris W Hirsch. Convergent activation dynamics in continuous time networks. Neural networks, 2(5):331-349, 1989.
  22. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4401-4410, 2019.
  23. Vijaymohan R Konda and Vivek S Borkar. Actor-critic-type learning algorithms for markov deci- sion processes. SIAM Journal on control and Optimization, 38(1):94-123, 1999.
  24. Rithesh Kumar, Sherjil Ozair, Anirudh Goyal, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Maximum entropy generators for energy-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08508, 2019. · arXiv
  25. Alistair Letcher, David Balduzzi, Sébastien Racanière, James Martens, Jakob N Foerster, Karl Tuyls, and Thore Graepel. Differentiable game mechanics. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20 (84):1-40, 2019.
  26. Jae Hyun Lim and Jong Chul Ye. Geometric GAN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02894, 2017. · arXiv
  27. James Martens. New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.1193, 2014. · arXiv
  28. Lars Mescheder, Sebastian Nowozin, and Andreas Geiger. The numerics of gans. In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pp. 1825-1835.
  29. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6779-the-numerics-of-gans.pdf.
  30. Lars Mescheder, Andreas Geiger, and Sebastian Nowozin. Which training methods for gans do actually converge? In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3478-3487, 2018.
  31. Luke Metz, Ben Poole, David Pfau, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. Unrolled generative adversarial networks. CoRR, abs/1611.02163, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02163. · arXiv
  32. Takeru Miyato and Masanori Koyama. cGANs with projection discriminator. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05637, 2018. · arXiv
  33. Takeru Miyato, Toshiki Kataoka, Masanori Koyama, and Yuichi Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05957, 2018. · arXiv
  34. Razvan Pascanu and Yoshua Bengio. Revisiting natural gradient for deep networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3584, 2013. · arXiv
  35. Barak A Pearlmutter. Fast exact multiplication by the hessian. Neural computation, 6(1):147-160, 1994.
  36. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015. · arXiv
  37. Suman Ravuri and Oriol Vinyals. Classification accuracy score for conditional generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 12268-12279, 2019.
  38. Ali Razavi, Aaron van den Oord, and Oriol Vinyals. Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 14866-14876, 2019.
  39. Nicolas L Roux, Pierre-Antoine Manzagol, and Yoshua Bengio. Topmoumoute online natural gra- dient algorithm. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 849-856, 2008.
  40. Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2234-2242, 2016.
  41. Andrew M Saxe, James L McClelland, and Surya Ganguli. Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynam- ics of learning in deep linear neural networks. ICLR, 2014.
  42. Akinori Tanaka. Discriminator optimal transport. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6813-6823, 2019.
  43. Dustin Tran, Rajesh Ranganath, and David Blei. Hierarchical implicit models and likelihood-free variational inference. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5523-5533, 2017.
  44. Carl Vondrick, Hamed Pirsiavash, and Antonio Torralba. Generating videos with scene dynamics. In Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 613-621, 2016.
  45. Max Welling and Yee W Teh. Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dynamics. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11), pp. 681-688, 2011.
  46. Yan Wu, Mihaela Rosca, and Timothy Lillicrap. Deep compressed sensing. In International Con- ference on Machine Learning, pp. 6850-6860, 2019.
  47. Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2223-2232, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Donahue, J., Balduzzi, D., Simonyan, K., & Lillicrap, T.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1912.00953
arXiv
1912.00953
References
5
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review