PreprintCited by 9Astronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Hybrid Physical-Deep Learning Model for Astronomical Inverse Problems

Open access
Lanusse, Francois, Melchior, Peter, Moolekamp, Fred·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We present a Bayesian machine learning architecture that combines a physically motivated parametrization and an analytic error model for the likelihood with a deep generative model providing a powerful data-driven prior for complex signals. This combination yields an interpretable and differentiable generative model, allows the incorporation of prior knowledge, and can be utilized for observations with different data quality without having to retrain the deep network. We demonstrate our approach with an example of astronomical source separation in current imaging data, yielding a physical and interpretable model of astronomical scenes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.03980

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of physically motivated models with data-driven ones appears as an appealing solution for deblending.

    “The combination of physically motivated models with data-driven ones appears as an appealing solution which will likely become important in the future.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Lanusse, Melchior, & Moolekamp (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Chen, X., Mishra, N., Rohaninejad, M., and Abbeel, P. (2018). PixelSNAIL: An improved autoregressive generative model. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018 , 2:1364-1372.
  2. Combettes, P. L. and Wajs, V. R. (2005). Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 4(4):1168-1200.
  3. Dave, A., Vadathya, A. K., Subramanyam, R., Baburajan, R., and Mitra, K. (2018). Solving Inverse Computational Imaging Problems Using Deep Pixel-Level Prior. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , 5(1):37-51.
  4. Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., and Tang, X. (2016). Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 38(2):295-307.
  5. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., and Mirza, M. (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: . . . , pages 1-9.
  6. Koekemoer, A., Aussel, H., Calzetti, D., Capak, P., Giavalisco, M., Kneib, J.-P., Leauthaud, A., Le Fèvre, O., Mccracken, H., Massey, R., Mobasher, B., Rhodes, J., Scoville, N., and Shopbell, P. (2007). The COSMOS survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys observations and data processing. Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series , 172(1):196-202.
  7. Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., Augueres, J. L., Brinchmann, J., Cole, R., Cropper, M., Dabin, C., Duvet, L., Ealet, A., Garilli, B., Gondoin, P., Guzzo, L., Hoar, J., Hoekstra, H., Holmes, R., Kitching, T., Maciaszek, T., Mellier, Y., Pasian, F., Percival, W., Rhodes, J., Saavedra Criado, G., Sauvage, M., Scaramella, R., Valenziano, L., Warren, S., Bender, R., Castander, F., Cimatti, A., Le Fevre, O., Kurki-Suonio, H., Levi, M., Lilje, P., Meylan, G., Nichol, R., Pedersen, K., Popa, V., Rebolo Lopez, R., Rix, H. W., Rottgering, H., Zeilinger, W., Grupp, F., Hudelot, P., Massey, R., Meneghetti, M., Miller, L., Paltani, S., Paulin-Henriksson, S., Pires, S., Saxton, C., Schrabback, T., Seidel, G., Walsh, J., Aghanim, N., Amendola, L., Bartlett, J., Baccigalupi, C., Beaulieu, J. P., Benabed, K., Cuby, J. G., Elbaz, D., Fosalba, P., Gavazzi, G., Helmi, A., Hook, I., Irwin, M., Kneib, J. P., Kunz, M., Mannucci, F., Moscardini, L., Tao, C., Teyssier, R., Weller, J., Zamorani, G., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Boulade, O., Foumond, J. J., Di Giorgio, A., Guttridge, P., James, A., Kemp, M., Martignac, J., Spencer, A., Walton, D., Blumchen, T., Bonoli, C., Bortoletto, F., Cerna, C., Corcione, L., Fabron, C., Jahnke, K., Ligori, S., Madrid, F., Martin, L., Morgante, G., Pamplona, T., Prieto, E., Riva, M., Toledo, R., Trifoglio, M., Zerbi, F., Abdalla, F., Douspis, M., Grenet, C., Borgani, S., Bouwens, R., Courbin, F., Delouis, J. M., Dubath, P., Fontana, A., Frailis, M., Grazian, A., Koppenhofer, J., Mansutti, O., Melchior, M., Mignoli, M., Mohr, J., Neissner, C., Noddle, K., Poncet, M., Scodeggio, M., Serrano, S., Shane, N., Starck, J. L., Surace, C., Taylor, A., Verdoes-Kleijn, G., Vuerli, C., Williams, O. R., Zacchei, A., Altieri, B., Escudero Sanz, I., Kohley, R., Oosterbroek, T., Astier, P., Bacon, D., Bardelli, S., Baugh, C., Bellagamba, F., Benoist, C., Bianchi, D., Biviano, A., Branchini, E., Carbone, C., Cardone, V., Clements, D., Colombi, S., Conselice, C., Cresci, G., Deacon, N., Dunlop, J., Fedeli, C., Fontanot, F., Franzetti, P., Giocoli, C., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gow, J., Heavens, A., Hewett, P., Heymans, C., Holland, A., Huang, Z., Ilbert, O., Joachimi, B., Jennins, E., Kerins, E., Kiessling, A., Kirk, D., Kotak, R., Krause, O., Lahav, O., van Leeuwen, F., Lesgourgues, J., Lombardi, M., Magliocchetti, M., Maguire, K., Majerotto, E., Maoli, R., Marulli, F., Maurogordato, S., McCracken, H., McLure, R., Melchiorri, A., Merson, A., Moresco, M., Nonino, M., Norberg, P., Peacock, J., Pello, R., Penny, M., Pettorino, V., Di Porto, C., Pozzetti, L., Quercellini, C., Radovich, M., Rassat, A., Roche, N., Ronayette, S., Rossetti, E., Sartoris, B., Schneider, P., Semboloni, E., Serjeant, S., Simpson, F., Skordis, C., Smadja, G., Smartt, S., Spano, P., Spiro, S., Sullivan, M., Tilquin, A., Trotta, R., Verde, L., Wang, Y ., Williger, G., Zhao, G., Zoubian, J., and Zucca, E. (2011). Euclid Definition Study Report. ArXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1110.3193. · arXiv
  8. Lempitsky, V., Vedaldi, A., and Ulyanov, D. (2018). Deep Image Prior. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9446-9454.
  9. Pepper, J., Peterson, J. R., Petry, C., Pinto, P. A., Pizagno, J. L., Popescu, B., Prsa, A., Radcka, V., Raddick, M. J., Rasmussen, A., Rau, A., Rho, J., Rhoads, J. E., Richards, G. T., Ridgway, S. T., Robertson, B. E., Roskar, R., Saha, A., Sarajedini, A., Scannapieco, E., Schalk, T., Schindler, R., Schmidt, S., Schmidt, S., Schneider, D. P., Schumacher, G., Scranton, R., Sebag, J., Seppala, L. G., Shemmer, O., Simon, J. D., Sivertz, M., Smith, H. A., Smith, J. A., Smith, N., Spitz, A. H., Stanford, A., Stassun, K. G., Strader, J., Strauss, M. A., Stubbs, C. W., Sweeney, D. W., Szalay, A., Szkody, P., Takada, M., Thorman, P., Trilling, D. E., Trimble, V., Tyson, A., Van Berg, R., Berk, D. V., VanderPlas, J., Verde, L., Vrsnak, B., Walkowicz, L. M., Wandelt, B. D., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Warner, M., Wechsler, R. H., West, A. A., Wiecha, O., Williams, B. F., Willman, B., Wittman, D., Wolff, S. C., Wood-Vasey, W. M., Wozniak, P., Young, P., Zentner, A., and Zhan, H. (2009). LSST Science Book, Version 2.0. arXiv.org , astro-ph.I(November):201.
  10. Mandelbaum, R., Rowe, B., Bosch, J., Chang, C., Courbin, F., Gill, M., Jarvis, M., Kannawadi, A., Kacprzak, T., Lackner, C., Leauthaud, A., Miyatake, H., Nakajima, R., Rhodes, J., Simet, M., Zuntz, J., Armstrong, B., Bridle, S., Coupon, J., Dietrich, J. P., Gentile, M., Heymans, C., Jurling, A. S., Kent, S. M., Kirkby, D., Margala, D., Massey, R., Melchior, P., Peterson, J., Roodman, A., and Schrabback, T. (2014). The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (GREAT3) Challenge Handbook. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , 212(1):5.
  11. Oord, A. v. d., Kalchbrenner, N., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). Pixel Recurrent Neural Networks. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 48.
  12. Reiman, D. M. and Göhre, B. E. (2019). Deblending galaxy superpositions with branched generative adversarial networks. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 485(2):2617-2627.
  13. Salimans, T., Karpathy, A., Chen, X., and Kingma, D. P. (2017). PixelCNN++: Improving the PixelCNN with Discretized Logistic Mixture Likelihood and Other Modifications. pages 1-10.
  14. Yang, Y., Sun, J., Li, H., and Xu, Z. (2016). Deep ADMM-Net for compressive sensing MRI. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , (Nips):10-18.

Authors
Lanusse, F., Melchior, P., & Moolekamp, F.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993717751
Cited by
9
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
Bayesian learning, deep generative models, physical priors, interpretable models, astronomical imaging, data-driven priors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review