The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Synthetic Datasets for Neural Program Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
The goal of program synthesis is to automatically generate programs in a particular language from corresponding specifications, e.g. input-output behavior. Many current approaches achieve impressive results after training on randomly generated I/O examples in limited domain-specific languages (DSLs), as with string transformations in RobustFill. However, we empirically discover that applying test input generation techniques for languages with control flow and rich input space causes deep networks to generalize poorly to certain data distributions; to correct this, we propose a new methodology for controlling and evaluating the bias of synthetic data distributions over both programs and specifications. We demonstrate, using the Karel DSL and a small Calculator DSL, that training deep networks on these distributions leads to improved cross-distribution generalization performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A second source of shifts is programming languages, which includes adaptation across different domain-specific languages (DSLs), e.g., in robotic environments (Shin et al., 2019); and across different versions of languages, e.g., Python 2 and 3 (Malloy and Power, 2017).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Shin et al., 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518
“A second source of shifts is programming languages, which includes adaption across different domain-specific languages (DSLs) (e.g., for robotic environments) (Shin et al., 2019) and different versions of languages (e.g., Python 2 and 3) (Malloy and Power, 2017).”
Latent Execution for Neural Program Synthesis
Chen, X., Song, D., & Tian, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00101 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, R., Kant, N., Gupta, K., Bender, C., Trabucco, B., Singh, R., & Song, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1912.12345
- OpenAlex
- W2924497240
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Keywords
- neural program synthesis, synthetic dataset, test data generation, domain-specific languages, input-output specifications, bias control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic Datasets for Neural Program Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1912.12345
- The paper
- Shin, R., Kant, N., Gupta, K., Bender, C., Trabucco, B., Singh, R., & Song, D. (2019). Synthetic Datasets for Neural Program Synthesis. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1912.12345