The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Recent research in artificial intelligence and machine learning has largely emphasized general-purpose learning and ever-larger training sets and more and more compute. In contrast, I propose a hybrid, knowledge-driven, reasoning-based approach, centered around cognitive models, that could provide the substrate for a richer, more robust AI than is currently possible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local models expressed as a sequential function of input variables can be more efficient than model simulations because limited segments of the system are more inclined to be continuous.
“Local models expressed as a sequential function of input variables can be more efficient than model simulations because limited segments of the system are more inclined to be continuous [52], [55].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
There exist several surveys conducted that primarily focus on one or two aspects of TAI.
“There exist several surveys conducted that primarily focus on one or two aspects of TAI.”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The sole prerequisite for a model to be included in computational transparency is that the user must be able to evaluate it using a statistical and parametric analysis.
“Generally, the sole prerequisite for a model to be included in this category is that the user must be able to evaluate it using a statistical and parametric analysis [52].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 94 · Cited by 297
- Authors
- Marcus, G.
- Corresponding author
- Marcus, Gary
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2002.06177
- OpenAlex
- W3005742798
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
- Keywords
- cognitive models, hybrid AI architecture, training data size, computational cost
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
