Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundaries
Open accessAbstract
Important insights towards the explainability of neural networks reside in the characteristics of their decision boundaries. In this work, we borrow tools from the field of adversarial robustness, and propose a new perspective that relates dataset features to the distance of samples to the decision boundary. This enables us to carefully tweak the position of the training samples and measure the induced changes on the boundaries of CNNs trained on large-scale vision datasets. We use this framework to reveal some intriguing properties of CNNs. Specifically, we rigorously confirm that neural networks exhibit a high invariance to non-discriminative features, and show that the decision boundaries of a DNN can only exist as long as the classifier is trained with some features that hold them together. Finally, we show that the construction of the decision boundary is extremely sensitive to small perturbations of the training samples, and that changes in certain directions can lead to sudden invariances in the orthogonal ones. This is precisely the mechanism that adversarial training uses to achieve robustness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CNNs primarily exploit discriminative features from the low-frequency regions of the input data.
“Furthermore, CNNs primarily exploit discriminative features from the low-frequency regions of the input data.”
From Vision Transformers Are Robust Learners (2022) · cites this paper as Ortiz-Jimenez et al. 2020
Small adversarial perturbations can change the decision boundary of neural networks, especially CNNs.
“In (Ortiz-Jimenez et al. 2020), it is shown that small adversarial perturbations can change the decision boundary of neural networks (especially CNNs) and that adversarial training (Madry et al. 2018) exploits this sensitivity to induce robustness.”
From Vision Transformers Are Robust Learners (2022) · cites this paper as Ortiz-Jimenez et al. 2020
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vision Transformers Are Robust Learners
Paul, S., & Chen, P.-Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i2.20103 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
“In (Ortiz-Jimenez et al. 2020), it is shown that small adversarial perturbations can change the decision boundary of neural networks (especially CNNs) and that adversarial training (Madry et al.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Ortiz-Jimenez, G., Modas, A., Moosavi-Dezfooli, S.-M., & Frossard, P.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Modas, Apostolos
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 2935-2946
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2002.06349
- OpenAlex
- W3005931954
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- CHIST-ERA (20CH21_180444)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- explainable AI, adversarial robustness, discriminative features, adversarial training, perturbation sensitivity, convolutional neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review