PreprintCited by 11Recommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AINames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Investigating Potential Factors Associated with Gender Discrimination in Collaborative Recommender Systems

Open access
Mansoury, Masoud, Abdollahpouri, Himan, Smith, Jessie, Dehpanah, Arman, Pechenizkiy, Mykola, Mobasher, Bamshad·2020·arXiv

Abstract

The proliferation of personalized recommendation technologies has raised concerns about discrepancies in their recommendation performance across different genders, age groups, and racial or ethnic populations. This varying degree of performance could impact users' trust in the system and may pose legal and ethical issues in domains where fairness and equity are critical concerns, like job recommendation. In this paper, we investigate several potential factors that could be associated with discriminatory performance of a recommendation algorithm for women versus men. We specifically study several characteristics of user profiles and analyze their possible associations with disparate behavior of the system towards different genders. These characteristics include the anomaly in rating behavior, the entropy of users' profiles, and the users' profile size. Our experimental results on a public dataset using four recommendation algorithms show that, based on all the three mentioned factors, women get less accurate recommendations than men indicating an unfair nature of recommendation algorithms across genders.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2002.07786

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Mansoury, M., Abdollahpouri, H., Smith, J., Dehpanah, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Mobasher, B.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • DePaul University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
193-196
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006564761
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Florida AI Research Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
gender discrimination, collaborative recommender systems, algorithmic fairness, personalized recommendation, job recommendation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review