Investigating Potential Factors Associated with Gender Discrimination in Collaborative Recommender Systems
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of personalized recommendation technologies has raised concerns about discrepancies in their recommendation performance across different genders, age groups, and racial or ethnic populations. This varying degree of performance could impact users' trust in the system and may pose legal and ethical issues in domains where fairness and equity are critical concerns, like job recommendation. In this paper, we investigate several potential factors that could be associated with discriminatory performance of a recommendation algorithm for women versus men. We specifically study several characteristics of user profiles and analyze their possible associations with disparate behavior of the system towards different genders. These characteristics include the anomaly in rating behavior, the entropy of users' profiles, and the users' profile size. Our experimental results on a public dataset using four recommendation algorithms show that, based on all the three mentioned factors, women get less accurate recommendations than men indicating an unfair nature of recommendation algorithms across genders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Popularity bias can degrade the system's performance.
“Additionally, popularity bias can degrade the system's performance [71, 76].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [76]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slokom, M., Hanjalic, A., & Larson, M. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102722 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651
- Authors
- Mansoury, M., Abdollahpouri, H., Smith, J., Dehpanah, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Mobasher, B.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- DePaul University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 193-196
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2002.07786
- OpenAlex
- W3006564761
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- The Florida AI Research Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- gender discrimination, collaborative recommender systems, algorithmic fairness, personalized recommendation, job recommendation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review