Descriptive and Predictive Analysis of Euroleague Basketball Games and the Wisdom of Basketball Crowds
Open accessAbstract
In this study we focus on the prediction of basketball games in the Euroleague competition using machine learning modelling. The prediction is a binary classification problem, predicting whether a match finishes 1 (home win) or 2 (away win). Data is collected from the Euroleague's official website for the seasons 2016-2017, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, i.e. in the new format era. Features are extracted from matches' data and off-the-shelf supervised machine learning techniques are applied. We calibrate and validate our models. We find that simple machine learning models give accuracy not greater than 67% on the test set, worse than some sophisticated benchmark models. Additionally, the importance of this study lies in the "wisdom of the basketball crowd" and we demonstrate how the predicting power of a collective group of basketball enthusiasts can outperform machine learning models discussed in this study. We argue why the accuracy level of this group of "experts" should be set as the benchmark for future studies in the prediction of (European) basketball games using machine learning.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive relevant analyses on prediction for European basketball are limited.
“Although a variety of sports studies have been published in several journals, extensive relevant analyses on prediction for European basketball are limited; see for some examples in Horvat et al. (2018), Giasemidis (2020) and Ball? & ¨Ozdemir (2021).”
From Predictions of european basketball match results with machine learning algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as Giasemidis (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3][3] Georgios Giasemidis, Colin Singleton, Ioannis Agrafiotis, Jason R. C. Nurse, Alan Pilgrim, Chris Willis, and D. V. Greetham. Determining the veracity of rumours on twitter. In Emma Spiro and Yong-Yeol Ahn, editors, Social Informatics: 8th International Conference, SocInfo 2016, Bellevue, WA, USA, November 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I , pages 185-205. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016. -
- [6][6] Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 2009. -
- [7][7] S. Jain and H. Kaur. Machine learning approaches to predict basketball game outcome. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing,Communication Automation (ICACCA) (Fall) , pages 1-7, Sep. 2017. -
- [8][8] Justin Kubatko, Dean Oliver, Kevin Pelton, and Dan T Rosenbaum. A starting point for analyzing basketball statistics. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports , 3, 2007. -
- [9][9] Daniel McGehee Rust. An analysis of new performance metrics in the nba and their effects on win production and salary. Master's thesis, University of Mississippi, USA, 2014. -
- [12][12] F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 12:2825-2830, 2011. -
- [14][14] Renato Amorim Torres. Prediction of nba games based on machine learning methods. Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin Madison, USA, December 2013. -
- [15][15] Michel Verleysen and Damien Fran¸ cois. The curse of dimensionality in data mining and time series prediction. In Joan Cabestany, Alberto Prieto, and Francisco Sandoval, editors, Computational Intelligence and Bioinspired Systems , pages 758-770, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. -
- [16][16] Albrecht Zimmermann, Sruthi Moorthy, and Zifan Shi. Predicting college basketball match outcomes using machine learning techniques: some results and lessons learned. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.3607 , 2013. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predictions of european basketball match results with machine learning algorithms
Lampis, T., Ioannis, N., Vasilios, V., & Stavrianna, D. (2023) · Journal of Sports Analytics · doi:10.3233/jsa-220639 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giasemidis, G.
- Corresponding author
- Giasemidis, Georgios
- ORCID
- Giasemidis, Georgios
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2002.08465
- OpenAlex
- W3007208975
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- Euroleague, home advantage, wisdom of crowds, machine learning prediction accuracy, sports match outcome prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
