A Snooze-less User-Aware Notification System for Proactive Conversational Agents
Open accessAbstract
The ubiquity of smart phones and electronic devices has placed a wealth of information at the fingertips of consumers as well as creators of digital content. This has led to millions of notifications being issued each second from alerts about posted YouTube videos to tweets, emails and personal messages. Adding work related notifications and we can see how quickly the number of notifications increases. Not only does this cause reduced productivity and concentration but has also been shown to cause alert fatigue. This condition makes users desensitized to notifications, causing them to ignore or miss important alerts. Depending on what domain users work in, the cost of missing a notification can vary from a mere inconvenience to life and death. Therefore, in this work, we propose an alert and notification framework that intelligently issues, suppresses and aggregates notifications, based on event severity, user preferences, or schedules, to minimize the need for users to ignore, or snooze their notifications and potentially forget about addressing important ones. Our framework can be deployed as a backend service, but is better suited to be integrated into proactive conversational agents, a field receiving a lot of attention with the digital transformation era, email services, news services and others. However, the main challenge lies in developing the right machine learning algorithms that can learn models from a wide set of users while customizing these models to individual users' preferences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reminders and alarms run the risk of becoming too persistent by requiring the user to keep snoozing or asking it to stop, leading to a drop in engagement levels over time resulting from alarm fatigue.
“Reminders and alarms also run the risk of becoming too persistent by requiring the user to keep snoozing or asking it to stop [38], leading to a drop in engagement levels over time resulting from alarm fatigue [32].”
From A Collaborative Approach to Support Medication Management in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Conversational Assistants (CAs) (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Sustaining long-term engagement beyond study duration is a critical issue that leads to failure of most interventions deployed for older adults.
“As identifed in [32,38], sustaining long-term engagement beyond study duration is a critical issue that leads to the failure of most interventions deployed for older adults.”
From A Collaborative Approach to Support Medication Management in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Conversational Assistants (CAs) (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
The Abstract (pp. 1–2) and Insights and Challenges (pp. 3–4) discuss notification fatigue and interface design, not engagement beyond a study’s duration or failure of interventions for older adults. Related Work (p. 2) mentions an assisted-living alert system but makes no claim about its long-term engagement. Searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTheir use continues at around 55 weeks through the writing of the paper.
“Their use, now at around 55 weeks, continues through the writing of this paper, which is a signifcant result for us given the need to sustain long-term engagement of technology with older adults, as mentioned in section 2.2 in [38].”
From A Collaborative Approach to Support Medication Management in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Conversational Assistants (CAs) (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
The Abstract (p. 1) describes a proposed notification framework, not a study of continued use. Related Work (p. 2) mentions an assisted-living alert system but gives no duration of use. Searches for 55 weeks and long-term engagement found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury
Tomašev, N., Glorot, X., Rae, J. W., Zielinski, M., Askham, H., Saraiva, A., Mottram, A., Meyer, C., Ravuri, S., Protsyuk, I., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1 · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [3][3] Shamsi T Iqbal and Brian P Bailey. 2008. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, 93-102. -
- [2][2] Charles Consel, Lucile Dupuy, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2015. A unifying notification system to scale up assistive services. In The 17th international SIGACCESS conference on computers & accessibility . ACM, 77-87. -
- [4][4] Asterios Leonidis et al. 2009. Alertme: A semantics-based contextaware notification system. In 33rd International Computer Software and Applications Conference , Vol. 2. IEEE. -
- [6][6] Hyungik Oh, Laleh Jalali, and Ramesh Jain. 2015. An intelligent notification system using context from real-time personal activity monitoring. In International Conference on Multimedia and Expo . IEEE, 1-6. -
- [5][5] Daniel R Murphy, Brian Reis, Dean F Sittig, and Hardeep Singh. 2012. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. The American journal of medicine 125, 2 (2012), 209-e1. -
- [7][7] Tadeusz Pietraszek and Axel Tanner. 2005. Data mining and machine learningâĂŤtowards reducing false positives in intrusion detection. Information security technical report 10, 3 (2005), 169-183. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathur, N., Dhodapkar, K., Zubatiy, T., Li, J., Jones, B., & Mynatt, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544830 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rizk, Y., Isahagian, V., Unuvar, M., & Khazaeni, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2003.02097
- OpenAlex
- W3165786713
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2020: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- alarm fatigue, user preferences, event severity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review