PreprintCited by 3Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisMachine Learning and Data ClassificationStatistical Methods and Inference

Post-Estimation Smoothing: A Simple Baseline for Learning with Side Information

Open access
Rolf, Esther, Jordan, Michael I., Recht, Benjamin·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Observational data are often accompanied by natural structural indices, such as time stamps or geographic locations, which are meaningful to prediction tasks but are often discarded. We leverage semantically meaningful indexing data while ensuring robustness to potentially uninformative or misleading indices. We propose a post-estimation smoothing operator as a fast and effective method for incorporating structural index data into prediction. Because the smoothing step is separate from the original predictor, it applies to a broad class of machine learning tasks, with no need to retrain models. Our theoretical analysis details simple conditions under which post-estimation smoothing will improve accuracy over that of the original predictor. Our experiments on large scale spatial and temporal datasets highlight the speed and accuracy of post-estimation smoothing in practice. Together, these results illuminate a novel way to consider and incorporate the natural structure of index variables in machine learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.05955

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poverty measures are highly correlated across space.

    “As poverty measures are highly correlated across space (Jean et al., 2018; Rolf et al., 2020), methods can utilize the provided location coordinates, and the country and urban/rural annotations, to improve robustness.”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Rolf et al., 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts

    Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518 · see citing works

    “Poverty measures are known to be highly correlated across space, meaning nearby villages will likely have similar poverty measures, and methods can utilize this spatial structure (using the provided location coordinate metadata) to improve predictions (Jean et al., 2018; Rolf et al., 2020).”
    Influential

Authors
Rolf, E., Jordan, M. I., & Recht, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
1759-1769
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011916859
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
side information, spatiotemporal prediction, smoothing operators, prediction accuracy improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review