Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Business (mis)Use Cases of Generative AI

Houde, Stephanie, Liao, Vera, Martino, Jacquelyn, Muller, Michael, Piorkowski, David, Richards, John, Weisz, Justin, Zhang, Yunfeng·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2003.07679arXiv 2003.07679
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Generative AI is a class of machine learning technology that learns to generate new data from training data. While deep fakes and media-and art-related generative AI breakthroughs have recently caught people's attention and imagination, the overall area is in its infancy for business use. Further, little is known about generative AI's potential for malicious misuse at large scale. Using co-creation design fictions with AI engineers, we explore the plausibility and severity of business misuse cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.07679

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Sakshi Agarwal and Lav R Varshney. 2019. Limits of Deepfake Detection: A Robust Estimation Viewpoint. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03493 (2019). · arXiv
  2. Cecilia Aragon, Clayton Hutto, Andy Echenique, Brittany Fiore-Gartland, Yun Huang, Jinyoung Kim, Gina Neff, Wanli Xing, and Joseph Bayer. 2016. Develop- ing a research agenda for human-centered data science. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. ACM, 529-535.
  3. Eric PS Baumer, June Ahn, Mei Bie, Elizabeth M Bonsignore, Ahmet Börütecene, Oğuz Turan Buruk, Tamara Clegg, Allison Druin, Florian Echtler, Dan Gruen, et al. 2014. CHI 2039: speculative research visions. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 761-770.
  4. Ian Beeson and Clodagh Miskelly. 2000. Dialogue and dissent in stories of com- munity. In Proc. PDC 2000. Citeseer.
  5. Mark Blythe and Elizabeth Buie. 2014. Chatbots of the gods: imaginary abstracts for techno-spirituality research. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 227-236.
  6. Mark Blythe, Enrique Encinas, Jofish Kaye, Miriam Lueck Avery, Rob McCabe, and Kristina Andersen. 2018. Imaginary design workbooks: Constructive crit- icism and practical provocation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 233.
  7. Mark Blythe, Jamie Steane, Jenny Roe, and Caroline Oliver. 2015. Solutionism, the game: design fictions for positive aging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3849-3858.
  8. Nadia Boukhelifa, Anastasia Bezerianos, Ioan Cristian Trelea, Nathalie Méjean Perrot, and Evelyne Lutton. 2019. An Exploratory Study on Visual Exploration of Model Simulations by Multiple Types of Experts. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 644.
  9. Danah Boyd and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provo- cations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society 15, 5 (2012), 662-679.
  10. Barry Brown, Julian Bleecker, Marco D'adamo, Pedro Ferreira, Joakim Formo, Mareike Glöss, Maria Holm, Kristina Höök, Eva-Carin Banka Johnson, Emil Kaburuan, et al. 2016. The IKEA Catalogue: Design fiction in academic and industrial collaborations. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 335-344.
  11. EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2018. Futuristic autobiographies: Weaving participant narratives to elicit values around robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 388-397.
  12. Nazli Cila, Iskander Smit, Elisa Giaccardi, and Ben Kröse. 2017. Products as agents: metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 448-459.
  13. Ciprian Dobre and Fatos Xhafa. 2014. Intelligent services for big data science. Future Generation Computer Systems 37 (2014), 267-281.
  14. Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell. 2014. Resistance is futile: reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 4 (2014), 769-778.
  15. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media.
  16. Hugh Durrant-Whyte. 2015. Data, knowledge and discovery: Machine learn- ing meets natural science. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 7-7.
  17. Melanie Feinberg. 2017. A design perspective on data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2952-2963.
  18. Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. MIT press.
  19. David Güera and Edward J Delp. 2018. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). IEEE, 1-6.
  20. Felix Heibeck, Alexis Hope, and Julie Legault. 2014. Sensory fiction: a design fiction of emotional computation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences. ACM, 35-40.
  21. Anthony JG Hey, Stewart Tansley, Kristin M Tolle, et al. 2009. The fourth par- adigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Vol. 1. Microsoft research Redmond, WA.
  22. Sean Kandel, Andreas Paepcke, Joseph Hellerstein, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. Wran- gler: Interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts. In Proceed- ings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3363-3372.
  23. Pavel Korshunov and Sébastien Marcel. 2019. Vulnerability assessment and de- tection of deepfake videos. In The 12th IAPR International Conference on Biomet- rics (ICB). 1-6.
  24. Yuezun Li and Siwei Lyu. 2018. Exposing deepfake videos by detecting face warping artifacts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00656 2 (2018). · arXiv
  25. Ann Light. 2011. Democratising technology: making transformation using de- signing, performance and props. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2239-2242.
  26. Joseph Lindley. 2015. Researching Design Fiction With Design Fiction. In Pro- ceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, 325-326.
  27. Joseph Lindley and Robert Potts. 2014. A machine learning: an example of HCI prototyping with design fiction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 1081-1084.
  28. Renée J Miller. 2017. The future of data integration. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 3-3.
  29. Michael Muller, Melanie Feinberg, Timothy George, Steven J Jackson, Bonnie E John, Mary Beth Kery, and Samir Passi. 2019. Human-Centered Study of Data Science Work Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, W15.
  30. Michael Muller, Ingrid Lange, Dakuo Wang, David Piorkowski, Jason Tsay, Q Vera Liao, Casey Dugan, and Thomas Erickson. 2019. How Data Science Workers Work with Data: Discovery, Capture, Curation, Design, Creation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 126.
  31. Daniel Pargman, Elina Eriksson, Mattias Höjer, Ulrika Gunnarsson Östling, and Luciane Aguiar Borges. 2017. The (un) sustainability of imagined future infor- mation societies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 773-785.
  32. Samir Passi and Steven Jackson. 2017. Data vision: Learning to see through algorithmic abstraction. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 2436-2447.
  33. Samir Passi and Steven J Jackson. 2018. Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projects. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 136.
  34. Kathleen H Pine and Max Liboiron. 2015. The politics of measurement and ac- tion. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3147-3156.
  35. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. 2015. Unsupervised Repre- sentation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv e-prints, Article arXiv:1511.06434 (Nov 2015), arXiv:1511.06434 pages. arXiv:cs.LG/1511.06434 · arXiv
  36. Tye Rattenbury, Joseph M Hellerstein, Jeffrey Heer, Sean Kandel, and Connor Carreras. 2017. Principles of data wrangling: Practical techniques for data prepa- ration. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
  37. Britta F Schulte, Paul Marshall, and Anna L Cox. 2016. Homes for life: a design fiction probe. In Proceedings of the 9th nordic conference on human-computer in- teraction. ACM, 80.
  38. Michael Skirpan and Casey Fiesler. 2018. Ad empathy: A design fiction. In Pro- ceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork. ACM, 267-273.
  39. Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2016. PeriodShare: A Bloody Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human- Computer Interaction. ACM, 113.
  40. Bruce Sterling. 2009. Design fiction. interactions 16, 3 (2009), 20-24.
  41. Joshua Tanenbaum. 2014. Design fictional interactions: why HCI should care about stories. interactions 21, 5 (2014), 22-23.
  42. Joshua Tanenbaum, Marcel Pufal, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2016. The limits of our imagination: design fiction as a strategy for engaging with dystopian futures. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computing within Limits. ACM, 10.
  43. V Tsourikov. 2017. Generative inventions. In TRIZfest, Conference Proceedings. 178-184.
  44. Wil MP Van der Aalst. 2014. Data scientist: The engineer of the future. In Enterprise interoperability VI. Springer, 13-26.
  45. Tijn van der Zant, Matthijs Kouw, and Lambert Schomaker. 2013. Generative artificial intelligence. In Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 107-120.
  46. Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. Aarhus University Press, 97-108.
  47. Dakuo Wang, Justin D Weisz, Michael Muller, Parikshit Ram, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Yla Tausczik, Horst Samulowitz, and Alexander Gray. 2019. Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 211.
  48. Richmond Y Wong and Deirdre K Mulligan. 2016. When a product is still fic- tional: anticipating and speculating futures through concept videos. In Proceed- ings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 121-133.
  49. Richmond Y Wong, Deirdre K Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting values reflections by engaging privacy futures using design workbooks. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 111.
  50. Matthew Wood, Gavin Wood, and Madeline Balaam. 2017. They're Just Tixel Pits, Man: Disputing the'Reality'of Virtual Reality Pornography through the Story Completion Method. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5439-5451.
  51. David Wright, Rachel Finn, Raphael Gellert, Serge Gutwirth, Philip Schütz, Michael Friedewald, Silvia Venier, and Emilio Mordini. 2014. Ethical dilemma scenarios and emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 87 (2014), 325-336.
  52. Jonathan L Zittrain. 2005. The generative internet. Harv. L. Rev. 119 (2005), 1975.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Houde, S., Liao, V., Martino, J., Muller, M., Piorkowski, D., Richards, J., Weisz, J., & Zhang, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2003.07679
arXiv
2003.07679
References
1
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review